Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 17 168973 NNY 15 OZ
1 Yorkdale Rd; 3401 Dufferin St
- Status
- Appeal Received
- In progress
- Submitted
- 30 May 2017
- Appealed
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 1 Yorkdale Rd; 3401 Dufferin St
- Ward
- Ward 8 · Mike Colle
- Submitted
- 30 May 2017
- Status
- Appeal Received
- Outcome recorded
- In progress
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- Yes
- Size stated in the description
- 682,670 m² gross floor area
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
A Development Application has been submitted to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to allow for a long-term, mixed use plan for the entire Yorkdale Shopping Centre site. The original application included three conceptual block master plan options that comprised of a range of retail, office, hotel and residential uses with a maximum proposed total future gross floor area of 682,670 square metres and 2.29 Floor Space Index and an internal private above and below grade street network. The application has been revised into a single concept with expanded parkland and the inclusion of a public road. The proposal continues to propose a range of uses, including affordable housing which is intended to occur in a phased manner over the next 20+ years
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Oxford Properties GroupSM33377 · 17 June 2022 · “1 Yorkdale Road”
- Oxford Properties GroupSM33377 · 17 June 2022 · “3401 Dufferin Street”
- OPGI Management GP Inc.SM28028 · 15 April 2019 · “3401 Dufferin Street”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 8
33 lobbied · 57 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 33 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 12% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 57 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 26% | 0.03 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.