Address · Ward 8 · Mike Colle

3401 Dufferin St

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 2; 2 client organisations
Communications on those registrations: 7; 2 offices contacted
Applications at this address: 6; No published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 8 · Mike Colle
Location: 43.72607, -79.45147
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

OPGI Management GP Inc.SM28028 · 15 April 20194
Oxford Properties GroupSM33377 · 17 June 20223

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Ward 8 Eglinton-Lawrence5
Ward 21 Scarborough Centre2

Data table· 2 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 8 Eglinton-Lawrence	Member of council	5	3	6 September 2022
Ward 21 Scarborough Centre	Member of council	2	2	15 April 2019

All registrations· 2 rows

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM33377	Oxford Properties Group	3401 Dufferin Street	Planning and Development; Planning and Development Application; Planning and Development Applicatio…	17 June 2022 – 17 June 2023	3
SM28028	OPGI Management GP Inc.	3401 Dufferin Street	By-law / Regulation	15 April 2019 – 31 December 2026	4

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 14 August 2019Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 19 205970 NNY 08 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 22 January 2019Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0031/19NYClosed · Approved
Submitted 30 May 2017Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 17 168973 NNY 15 OZAppeal Received · In progress
Submitted 9 March 2015Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 15 125487 NNY 15 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 25 April 2013Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 13 156857 NNY 15 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 26 July 2010Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 10 228227 NNY 15 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)

Data table· 6 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
19 205970 NNY 08 OZ Development application	Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)	14 August 2019	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
A0031/19NY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	22 January 2019	Closed Approved
17 168973 NNY 15 OZ Development application	Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)	30 May 2017	Appeal Received In progress
15 125487 NNY 15 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	9 March 2015	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
13 156857 NNY 15 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	25 April 2013	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
10 228227 NNY 15 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	26 July 2010	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 8

33 lobbied · 57 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=3

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied26%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=78
Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied14%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 8: 33 lobbied and 57 matched unlobbied applications in 22 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	33	—	100% (n=3)	0%	12%	0.00
Matched, unlobbied	57	—	100% (n=3)	0%	26%	0.03

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	571	—	100% (n=78)	0%	12%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	760	—	96% (n=78)	4%	14%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Committee of Adjustment applications

Minor variance (MV), Ward 8

7 lobbied · 357 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 8: 7 lobbied and 357 matched unlobbied applications in 6 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	7	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	357	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 8

25 lobbied · 69 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=2

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied8%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=63
Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 8: 25 lobbied and 69 matched unlobbied applications in 16 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	25	—	100% (n=3)	0%	8%	0.00
Matched, unlobbied	69	—	100% (n=2)	0%	4%	0.00

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=63)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,236	—	97% (n=98)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.