Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 17 136251 STE 22 OZ
17 Millwood Rd; 21 Millwood Rd; 22 Davisville Ave; 1925 Yonge St; 1941 Yonge St; 1951 Yonge St
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 29 March 2017
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 17 Millwood Rd; 21 Millwood Rd; 22 Davisville Ave; 1925 Yonge St; 1941 Yonge St; 1951 Yonge St
- Ward
- Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
- Submitted
- 29 March 2017
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 450 units
- Related file
- 20 191099 STE 12 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Application Withdrawn - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment to permit two towers, 25 and 34 storeys in height, containing 450 residential units and approximately 8,232 square metres of commercial space on the ground, 2nd and 3rd floors. An on-site park at the northeast corner of the site is also proposed.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Times Group Corporation · registration SM23866
OPA & ZBA applications in support of redevelopment of 1951 Yonge St.
Evidence High confidence · score 0.91
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM23866: OPA & ZBA applications in support of redevelopment of 1951 Yonge St. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 136251 STE 22 OZ at 1925 Yonge St: Application Withdrawn - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment to permit two towers, 25 and 34 storeys in height, containing 450 residential units and approximately 8,232 square metres of commercial space on the ground, 2nd and 3rd floors. An on-site park at the northeast corner of the… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: OPA & ZBA applications in support of redevelopment of 1951 Yonge St.
Matched fields
- address
- 1951 YONGE ST
- application_address
- 1951 YONGE ST
Times Group Corporation · registration SM23499
ZBA application re 1925-1941 Yonge St./Millwood Rd.
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.73
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM23499: ZBA application re 1925-1941 Yonge St./Millwood Rd. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 136251 STE 22 OZ at 1925 Yonge St: Application Withdrawn - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment to permit two towers, 25 and 34 storeys in height, containing 450 residential units and approximately 8,232 square metres of commercial space on the ground, 2nd and 3rd floors. An on-site park at the northeast corner of the… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: ZBA application re 1925-1941 Yonge St./Millwood Rd.
Matched fields
- address
- 1925-1941 YONGE ST
- application_address
- 1925 YONGE ST
Lobbying on linked registrations
2 linked registrations · 2 communications · 1 meeting · 2 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 2 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Office of Councillor Matlow, Ward 12 | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 24 June 2020 |
| Ward 12 Toronto-St. Paul's | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 9 July 2020 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Times Group CorporationSM34034 · 12 January 2023 · “1951 Yonge Street”
- Times Group CorporationSM34034 · 12 January 2023 · “21 Millwood Road”
- Times Group CorporationSM34034 · 12 January 2023 · “22 Davisville Avenue”
- Times Group CorporationSM17926 · 19 March 2012 · “1941 Yonge Street”
- Greey Realty Holdings LimitedSM16504 · 30 May 2011 · “21 Millwood Road”
- Greey Realty Holdings LimitedSM16468 · 25 May 2011 · “21 Millwood Road”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 12
44 lobbied · 60 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 44 | — | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 14% | 0.02 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | — | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.