Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 16 269672 STE 19 SA

Ward 10 · Ausma MalikDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 21 December 2016; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 2; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 52; 16 meetings · 12 offices

Application record

Type: Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses: 28 Bathurst St
Ward: Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
Submitted: 21 December 2016
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Site Plan Application for retail market consisting of modified shipping containers on south portion of lot. Please be advised that this application is not related to the OPA / ZBA Application initiated by Build Toronto on this same property. (12 297477 STE 19 OZ).

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Stackt Properties LP · registration SM23950
28 Bathurst Street, Site Application, community involvement, innovative project
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.86
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM23950: 28 Bathurst Street, Site Application, community involvement, innovative project (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 269672 STE 19 SA at 28 Bathurst St: Site Plan Application for retail market consisting of modified shipping containers on south portion of lot. Please be advised that this application is not related to the OPA / ZBA Application initiated by Build Toronto on this same property. (12 297477 STE 19 OZ). (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 28 Bathurst Street, Site Application, community involvement, innovative project
Matched fields
address
28 BATHURST ST
application_address
28 BATHURST ST
Tusk Global Limited · registration SM23664
Development of site approvals for 28 Bathurst Street.
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.70
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM23664: Development of site approvals for 28 Bathurst Street. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 269672 STE 19 SA at 28 Bathurst St: Site Plan Application for retail market consisting of modified shipping containers on south portion of lot. Please be advised that this application is not related to the OPA / ZBA Application initiated by Build Toronto on this same property. (12 297477 STE 19 OZ). (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Development of site approvals for 28 Bathurst Street.
Matched fields
address
28 BATHURST ST
application_address
28 BATHURST ST

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 52 communications · 16 meetings · 12 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Mayor's office15
Ward 19 Trinity-Spadina9
Ward 10 Spadina-Fort York8
Councillor Layton5
Real Estate Services4
Deputy City Manager-Corporate Services3
Parks, Forestry and Recreation2
Councillor Cressy2

Data table· 12 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Mayor's office	Councillor staff	15	3	7 October 2019
Ward 19 Trinity-Spadina	Member of council	9	5	22 November 2018
Ward 10 Spadina-Fort York	Member of council	8	1	19 July 2022
Councillor Layton	Councillor staff	5	2	27 November 2017
Real Estate Services	City staff	4	1	14 August 2019
Deputy City Manager-Corporate Services	City staff	3	1	14 August 2019
Parks, Forestry and Recreation	City staff	2	1	24 July 2017
Councillor Cressy	Councillor staff	2	1	11 March 2019
Parks Development and Infrastructure Branch	City staff	1	1	30 May 2017
Mayor	Member of council	1	0	27 September 2017
Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina	Member of council	1	0	22 November 2018
Ward 9 Davenport	Member of council	1	0	24 July 2019

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Amir Remtulla and Associates1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10

66 lobbied · 165 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=5
Matched, unlobbied100% n=11

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied3%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=63
Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10: 66 lobbied and 165 matched unlobbied applications in 37 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	66	—	100% (n=5)	0%	3%	0.05
Matched, unlobbied	165	—	100% (n=11)	0%	2%	0.04

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=63)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,236	—	97% (n=98)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.