Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 16 269597 WET 13 OZ
66 Oakmount Rd; 111 Pacific Ave
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 21 December 2016
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 66 Oakmount Rd; 111 Pacific Ave
- Ward
- Ward 4 · Gord Perks
- Submitted
- 21 December 2016
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
This application proposes to amend the Zoning By-laws to permit one block of 5 3-storey townhouse, one 32 storey building, one 25 storey building, to be developed and added to the lands currently occupied by three residential rental buildings.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Minto Properties Inc.SM33111 · 25 March 2022 · “66 Oakmount Road.”
- Minto Properties Inc.SM33108 · 24 March 2022 · “111 Pacific Avenue.”
- Minto Apartments LP on Behalf of the Registered OwnersSM31197 · 26 January 2021 · “111 Pacific Avenue.”
- Minto Apartments LP on Behalf of the Registered OwnersSM31199 · 26 January 2021 · “66 Oakmount Road.”
- Minto Properties Inc.SM29174 · 18 November 2019 · “111 Pacific Avenue”
- Minto Properties Inc.SM29174 · 18 November 2019 · “66 Oakmount Road.”
- Minto Communities Inc.SM27962 · 3 April 2019 · “111 Pacific Avenue”
- Minto Communities Inc.SM27962 · 3 April 2019 · “66 Oakmount Road”
- Minto Communities Inc.SM27945 · 1 April 2019 · “111 Pacific Avenue”
- Minto Communities Inc.SM27945 · 1 April 2019 · “66 Oakmount Road”
- Minto Communities Inc.SM24839 · 17 July 2017 · “111 Pacific Avenue”
- Minto Communities Inc.SM24839 · 17 July 2017 · “66 Oakmount Road”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 4
12 lobbied · 20 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 12 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 20 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.