Address · Ward 4 · Gord Perks
111 Pacific Ave
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 4 · Gord Perks
- Location
- 43.65645, -79.46433
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
6These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 4 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mayor's Office | Councillor staff | 3 | 3 | 5 April 2019 |
| Ward 4 Parkdale-High Park | Member of council | 3 | 0 | 17 December 2019 |
| Ward 13 Parkdale-High Park | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 17 July 2017 |
| Mayor John Tory | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 15 May 2019 |
All registrations· 6 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM33108 | Minto Properties Inc. | 111 Pacific Avenue. | Planning and Development; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Develop… | 24 March 2022 – 24 March 2027 | 0 |
| SM31197 | Minto Apartments LP on Behalf of the Registered Owners | 111 Pacific Avenue. | Planning and Development; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Develop… | 26 January 2021 – 26 January 2027 | 0 |
| SM29174 | Minto Properties Inc. | 111 Pacific Avenue | Planning and Development, Heritage; Planning and Development, Rental Housing Demolition or Conversi… | 18 November 2019 – 27 August 2025 | 3 |
| SM27962 | Minto Communities Inc. | 111 Pacific Avenue | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 3 April 2019 – 3 April 2027 | 1 |
| SM27945 | Minto Communities Inc. | 111 Pacific Avenue | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 1 April 2019 – 31 December 2026 | 3 |
| SM24839 | Minto Communities Inc. | 111 Pacific Avenue | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 17 July 2017 – 31 December 2026 | 2 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 19 October 2021Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 21 227617 STE 04 SBUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 14 October 2020Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 20 206487 STE 04 SANOAC Issued · Approved
- Submitted 21 December 2016Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 16 269597 WET 13 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 227617 STE 04 SB Development application | Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB) | 19 October 2021 | Under Review In progress |
| 20 206487 STE 04 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 14 October 2020 | NOAC Issued Approved |
| 16 269597 WET 13 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 21 December 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
111 Pacific Ave · Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
21 227617 STE 04 SB · submitted 19 October 2021 · Under Review · from registration SM31197 (Minto Apartments LP on Behalf of the Registered Owners)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.73
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM31197: The project is a 32-storey and 25-storey purpose built rental with a seniors affordable housing component as well as five 3 storey townhouses. Located in the City of Toronto at 111 Pacific Avenue. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 227617 STE 04 SB at 111 Pacific Ave: Draft Plan of Subdivision for two development blocks. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: …ntal with a seniors affordable housing component as well as five 3 storey townhouses. Located in the City of Toronto at 111 Pacific Avenue.
Matched fields
- address
- 111 PACIFIC AVE
- application_address
- 111 PACIFIC AVE
111 Pacific Ave · Site Plan Approval (SA)
20 206487 STE 04 SA · submitted 14 October 2020 · NOAC Issued · from registration SM31197 (Minto Apartments LP on Behalf of the Registered Owners)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.92
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM31197: The project is a 32-storey and 25-storey purpose built rental with a seniors affordable housing component as well as five 3 storey townhouses. Located in the City of Toronto at 111 Pacific Avenue. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 206487 STE 04 SA at 111 Pacific Ave: This is a site plan application that proposes one block of 5 3-storey townhouse, one 32 storey building, one 25 storey building, to be developed and added to the lands currently occupied by three residential rental buildings. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: …ntal with a seniors affordable housing component as well as five 3 storey townhouses. Located in the City of Toronto at 111 Pacific Avenue.
Matched fields
- address
- 111 PACIFIC AVE
- application_address
- 111 PACIFIC AVE
111 Pacific Ave · Site Plan Approval (SA)
20 206487 STE 04 SA · submitted 14 October 2020 · NOAC Issued · from registration SM31199 (Minto Apartments LP on Behalf of the Registered Owners)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.92
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM31199: The project is a 32-storey and 25-storey purpose built rental with a seniors affordable housing component as well as five 3 storey townhouses. Located in the City of Toronto at 66 Oakmount Road. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 206487 STE 04 SA at 111 Pacific Ave: This is a site plan application that proposes one block of 5 3-storey townhouse, one 32 storey building, one 25 storey building, to be developed and added to the lands currently occupied by three residential rental buildings. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: …ntal with a seniors affordable housing component as well as five 3 storey townhouses. Located in the City of Toronto at 66 Oakmount Road.
Matched fields
- address
- 66 OAKMOUNT RD
- application_address
- 66 OAKMOUNT RD
111 Pacific Ave · Site Plan Approval (SA)
20 206487 STE 04 SA · submitted 14 October 2020 · NOAC Issued · from registration SM33108 (Minto Properties Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.72
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM33108: The proposed development is an infill project located north of High Park. 111 Pacific Avenue. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 206487 STE 04 SA at 111 Pacific Ave: This is a site plan application that proposes one block of 5 3-storey townhouse, one 32 storey building, one 25 storey building, to be developed and added to the lands currently occupied by three residential rental buildings. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: The proposed development is an infill project located north of High Park. 111 Pacific Avenue.
Matched fields
- address
- 111 PACIFIC AVE
- application_address
- 111 PACIFIC AVE
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 4
17 lobbied · 33 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 17 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 33 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 4
12 lobbied · 20 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 12 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 20 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.