Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 16 260247 WET 06 SA

Ward 3 · Amber MorleyDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 5 December 2016; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 1; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 0; 0 meetings · 0 offices

Application record

Type: Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses: 68 Daisy Ave
Ward: Ward 3 · Amber Morley
Submitted: 5 December 2016
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 73 units
Related file: 15 168656 WET 06 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

To permit the development of 4-storey townhomes within 5 residential blocks (for a total of 73 residential units).

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Dunpar Developments Inc. · registration SM22292
68 Daisy Avenue Zoning Bylaw Amendment and Site Plan Approval
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.89
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22292: 68 Daisy Avenue Zoning Bylaw Amendment and Site Plan Approval (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 260247 WET 06 SA at 68 Daisy Ave: To permit the development of 4-storey townhomes within 5 residential blocks (for a total of 73 residential units). (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 68 Daisy Avenue Zoning Bylaw Amendment and Site Plan Approval
Matched fields
address
68 DAISY AVE
application_address
68 DAISY AVE

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

No communications recorded.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 3

24 lobbied · 100 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied1,629

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=5
Matched, unlobbied70% n=10

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied30%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=61
Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 3: 24 lobbied and 100 matched unlobbied applications in 18 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	24	—	100% (n=5)	0%	4%	0.25
Matched, unlobbied	100	1,629	70% (n=10)	30%	4%	0.14

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=61)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,237	727	97% (n=96)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.