lobbyTO

Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 16 245157 STE 20 SA

40 Widmer St; 42 Widmer St; 44 Widmer St; 46 Widmer St; 48 Widmer St; 50 Widmer St; 52 Widmer St; 54 Widmer St; 56 Widmer St; 58 Widmer St

Status
Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted
31 October 2016
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
3
Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations
12
3 meetings · 4 offices

Application record

Type
Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses
40 Widmer St; 42 Widmer St; 44 Widmer St; 46 Widmer St; 48 Widmer St; 50 Widmer St; 52 Widmer St; 54 Widmer St; 56 Widmer St; 58 Widmer St
Ward
Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
Submitted
31 October 2016
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description
426 units
Related file
12 188716 STE 20 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Site Plan Control Application for construction of new a 41 storey building containing 426 residential units and 100 parking spaces (88 for residents, 12 for visitors) and 427 bicycle parking spaces.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Lobbying on linked registrations

3 linked registrations · 12 communications · 3 meetings · 4 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations
  • Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina7
  • Office of Councillor Cressy3
  • Chief Building Official (Toronto Building)1
  • Constituency Assistant to Cllr Cressy, Ward 201
Data table· 4 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Ward 20 Trinity-SpadinaMember of council7210 January 2017
Office of Councillor CressyCouncillor staff3015 January 2017
Chief Building Official (Toronto Building)City staff101 December 2016
Constituency Assistant to Cllr Cressy, Ward 20Councillor staff119 January 2015

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10

66 lobbied · 165 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied—
  • Matched, unlobbied1,881

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=5
  • Matched, unlobbied100% n=11

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied3%
  • Matched, unlobbied2%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied—
  • Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=61
  • Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied4%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%
Data table· 4 rows
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10: 66 lobbied and 165 matched unlobbied applications in 37 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied66—100% (n=5)0%3%0.05
Matched, unlobbied1651,881100% (n=11)0%2%0.04
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied449—100% (n=61)0%4%0.07
Matched, unlobbied1,23772797% (n=96)3%3%0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.