Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 16 242851 ESC 39 SA

Ward 22 · Nick MantasDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 26 October 2016; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 1; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 2; 2 meetings · 2 offices

Application record

Type: Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses: 2150 McNicoll Ave
Ward: Ward 22 · Nick Mantas
Submitted: 26 October 2016
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Proposal for a commercial retail plaza development incorporating two buildings: one large format food retailer and a multi-unit retail/restaurant building.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

GTA China Centre Inc · registration SM23990
2150 McNicoll Ave
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.88
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM23990: 2150 McNicoll Ave (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 242851 ESC 39 SA at 2150 Mcnicoll Ave: Proposal for a commercial retail plaza development incorporating two buildings: one large format food retailer and a multi-unit retail/restaurant building. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 2150 McNicoll Ave
Matched fields
address
2150 MCNICOLL AVE
application_address
2150 MCNICOLL AVE

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 2 communications · 2 meetings · 2 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Ward 39 Scarborough-Agincourt1
Ward 41 Scarborough-Rouge River1

Data table· 2 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 39 Scarborough-Agincourt	Member of council	1	1	23 August 2018
Ward 41 Scarborough-Rouge River	Member of council	1	1	30 January 2017

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Johnston Litavski Ltd.1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 22

7 lobbied · 14 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=61
Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 22: 7 lobbied and 14 matched unlobbied applications in 5 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	7	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	14	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=61)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,237	727	97% (n=96)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.