Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 16 232831 STE 28 OZ

157 Princess St; 254 King St E; 256 King St E; 260 King St E; 266 King St E; 427 Adelaide St E; 435 Adelaide St E

Ward 13 · Chris MoiseDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: OMB Approved; Approved
Submitted: 4 October 2016; Appealed
Linked lobbying registrations: 1; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 0; 0 meetings · 0 offices

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 157 Princess St; 254 King St E; 256 King St E; 260 King St E; 266 King St E; 427 Adelaide St E; 435 Adelaide St E
Ward: Ward 13 · Chris Moise
Submitted: 4 October 2016
Status: OMB Approved
Outcome recorded: Approved
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: Yes

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

The proposed mixed use redevelopment consists of two residential towers with a unified base building with tower heights of 34 and 36 storeys. The base building includes ground floor retail and second floor office space..

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

SAS Instittue (Canada) Inc. · registration SM25663
254 King Street East - Ward 28 - Land use Compatibility - Application 16 232831 STE 28OZ
Evidence High confidence · score 1.00
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM25663: 254 King Street East - Ward 28 - Land use Compatibility - Application 16 232831 STE 28OZ (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 232831 STE 28 OZ at 266 King St E: The proposed mixed use redevelopment consists of two residential towers with a unified base building with tower heights of 34 and 36 storeys. The base building includes ground floor retail and second floor office space.. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 254 King Street East - Ward 28 - Land use Compatibility - Application 16 232831 STE 28OZ
- particulars: 254 King Street East - Ward 28 - Land use Compatibility - Application 16 232831 STE 28OZ
Matched fields
file_number
16 232831 STE 28 OZ
address
254 KING ST E
application_address
254 KING ST E
Notes
The registration names this application's file number.

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

No communications recorded.

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Fitzrovia Residential Inc.
SM34046 · 16 January 2023 · “260 King Street East.”
SAS Institute (Canada) Inc.
SM26118 · 27 April 2018 · “260 King St E”
Northam Realty Advisors Limited
SM25844 · 13 March 2018 · “260 King Street East”
SAS Institute (Canada) Inc.
SM25708 · 1 March 2018 · “254 King Street East”
Northam Realty Advisors Limited
SM23628 · 18 October 2016 · “260 King Street East”
Northam Realty Advisors Limited
SM23629 · 18 October 2016 · “260 King Street East”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13

82 lobbied · 96 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=13
Matched, unlobbied90% n=14

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied10%

Appeal rate

Lobbied11%
Matched, unlobbied16%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=78
Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied14%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13: 82 lobbied and 96 matched unlobbied applications in 34 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	82	—	100% (n=13)	0%	11%	0.15
Matched, unlobbied	96	—	90% (n=14)	10%	16%	0.08

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	571	—	100% (n=78)	0%	12%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	760	—	96% (n=78)	4%	14%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.