Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 16 221931 STE 20 OZ
1 Queen's Park; 1 Spadina Cres; 6 Hoskin Ave; 7 Queen's Park Cres E; 27 King's College Crcl; 45 Willcocks St; 59 St George St; 70 St Joseph St; 70 St Mary St; 73 Queen's Park Cres E; 74 Wellesley St W; 88 College St; 90 Queen's Park; 100 Queen's Park; 110 Wellesley St W; 150 College St; 153 Bloor St W; 222 College St; 273 Bloor St W; 300 Huron St; 327 Bloor St W; 371 Bloor St W; 455 Spadina Ave; 655 Spadina Ave
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 13 September 2016
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 1 Queen's Park; 1 Spadina Cres; 6 Hoskin Ave; 7 Queen's Park Cres E; 27 King's College Crcl; 45 Willcocks St; 59 St George St; 70 St Joseph St; 70 St Mary St; 73 Queen's Park Cres E; 74 Wellesley St W; 88 College St; 90 Queen's Park; 100 Queen's Park; 110 Wellesley St W; 150 College St; 153 Bloor St W; 222 College St; 273 Bloor St W; 300 Huron St; 327 Bloor St W; 371 Bloor St W; 455 Spadina Ave; 655 Spadina Ave
- Ward
- Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
- Submitted
- 13 September 2016
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Official Plan Amendment application to establish a new University of Toronto St. George Campus Secondary Plan that would replace the existing University of Toronto Secondary Plan.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Loretto Ladies' Colleges and SchoolsSM19763 · 18 October 2013 · “70 St. Mary Street”
- Institute of the Blessed Virgin MarySM17285 · 11 October 2011 · “70 St. Mary Street”
- Loretto Colleges & SchoolsSM14114 · 16 February 2010 · “70 St Mary Street”
- Kerbel Group Inc.SM14118 · 16 February 2010 · “70 St. Mary St.”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 11
69 lobbied · 60 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 69 | — | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 11% | 0.03 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.