Address · Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
70 St Mary St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
- Location
- 43.66738, -79.39003
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
4These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale | Member of council | 7 | 7 | 22 July 2014 |
All registrations· 4 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM19763 | Loretto Ladies' Colleges and Schools | 70 St. Mary Street | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan | 18 October 2013 – 5 November 2018 | 4 |
| SM17285 | Institute of the Blessed Virgin Mary | 70 St. Mary Street | Planning and Development Application, Plan of Condominium; Planning and Development Application, Si… | 11 October 2011 – 11 October 2011 | 0 |
| SM14114 | Loretto Colleges & Schools | 70 St Mary Street | Planning Development Application Official Plan & Zoning By-law | 16 February 2010 – 16 February 2010 | 0 |
| SM14118 | Kerbel Group Inc. | 70 St. Mary St. | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 16 February 2010 – 16 May 2015 | 3 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 9 December 2024Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A1045/24TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 13 September 2016Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 16 221931 STE 20 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 24 February 2010Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 10 122799 STE 27 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A1045/24TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 9 December 2024 | Closed Approved |
| 16 221931 STE 20 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 13 September 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 10 122799 STE 27 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 24 February 2010 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
70 St Mary St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
10 122799 STE 27 OZ · submitted 24 February 2010 · Closed · from registration SM14118 (Kerbel Group Inc.)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.92
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM14118: Pre-submission consultation for 70 St. Mary St. re OPA & ZBA (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 10 122799 STE 27 OZ at 70 St Mary St: OPA and Rezoning application for a proposed new 40 storey mixed use building with Institutional uses/Loretto College, including a chapel, meeting rooms and accessory office space, and a total of 298 residential units (including 220 residential condo units, 70 student residence rooms and 8 suites fo… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Pre-submission consultation for 70 St. Mary St. re OPA & ZBA
Matched fields
- address
- 70 ST MARY ST
- application_address
- 70 ST MARY ST
70 St Mary St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
10 122799 STE 27 OZ · submitted 24 February 2010 · Closed · from registration SM17285 (Institute of the Blessed Virgin Mary)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.86
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM17285: meeting with Councillor Wong-Tamwith respect to the Loretto College Site, 70 St. Mary Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 10 122799 STE 27 OZ at 70 St Mary St: OPA and Rezoning application for a proposed new 40 storey mixed use building with Institutional uses/Loretto College, including a chapel, meeting rooms and accessory office space, and a total of 298 residential units (including 220 residential condo units, 70 student residence rooms and 8 suites fo… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: meeting with Councillor Wong-Tamwith respect to the Loretto College Site, 70 St. Mary Street
Matched fields
- address
- 70 ST MARY ST
- application_address
- 70 ST MARY ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 11
16 lobbied · 354 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 354 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 11
69 lobbied · 60 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 69 | — | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 11% | 0.03 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.