Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 16 148149 WET 13 OZ
1 Riverview Gdns; 3 Riverview Gdns; 5 Riverview Gdns; 7 Riverview Gdns; 9 Riverview Gdns; 2442 Bloor St W; 2444 Bloor St W; 2446 Bloor St W; 2448 Bloor St W; 2450 Bloor St W; 2452 Bloor St W; 2454 Bloor St W
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 29 April 2016
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 1 Riverview Gdns; 3 Riverview Gdns; 5 Riverview Gdns; 7 Riverview Gdns; 9 Riverview Gdns; 2442 Bloor St W; 2444 Bloor St W; 2446 Bloor St W; 2448 Bloor St W; 2450 Bloor St W; 2452 Bloor St W; 2454 Bloor St W
- Ward
- Ward 4 · Gord Perks
- Submitted
- 29 April 2016
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Proposed amendments to the Official Plan and Zoning Bylaw to permit the development of a fourteen (14) storey mixed-use building with 193 residential (condominium) units and ground floor retail space fronting on Bloor Street West.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Bloor Riverview Residences Corp. · registration SM22574
Redevelopment of 2442-2454 Bloor Street West
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.73
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22574: Redevelopment of 2442-2454 Bloor Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 148149 WET 13 OZ at 2452 Bloor St W: Proposed amendments to the Official Plan and Zoning Bylaw to permit the development of a fourteen (14) storey mixed-use building with 193 residential (condominium) units and ground floor retail space fronting on Bloor Street West. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Redevelopment of 2442-2454 Bloor Street West
Matched fields
- address
- 2442-2454 BLOOR ST W
- application_address
- 2442 BLOOR ST W
Plazacorp Investments Limited · registration SM22566
2442-2454 Bloor Street West Development Application
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.85
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22566: 2442-2454 Bloor Street West Development Application (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 148149 WET 13 OZ at 2452 Bloor St W: Proposed amendments to the Official Plan and Zoning Bylaw to permit the development of a fourteen (14) storey mixed-use building with 193 residential (condominium) units and ground floor retail space fronting on Bloor Street West. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 2442-2454 Bloor Street West Development Application
Matched fields
- address
- 2442-2454 BLOOR ST W
- application_address
- 2442 BLOOR ST W
Lobbying on linked registrations
2 linked registrations · 20 communications · 11 meetings · 7 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 8 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gord Perks | Councillor staff | 5 | 0 | 4 December 2024 |
| Ward 13 Parkdale-High Park | Member of council | 4 | 4 | 27 March 2017 |
| Ward 4 Parkdale-High Park | Member of council | 3 | 2 | 28 February 2019 |
| Councillor Doucette, Ward 13 | Councillor staff | 2 | 2 | 27 March 2017 |
| Councillor Gord Perks | Councillor staff | 2 | 0 | 3 December 2021 |
| Gord Perks | Councillor staff | 2 | 2 | 26 February 2020 |
| Office of Councillor Doucette, Ward 13 | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 15 December 2015 |
| Gord Perks | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 30 October 2023 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 4
12 lobbied · 20 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 12 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 20 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.