Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 16 130337 WET 03 OZ

62 Dixfield Dr; 70 Dixfield Dr; 710 The West Mall

Ward 2 · Stephen HolydayDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 21 March 2016; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 1; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 1; 1 meeting · 1 office

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 62 Dixfield Dr; 70 Dixfield Dr; 710 The West Mall
Ward: Ward 2 · Stephen Holyday
Submitted: 21 March 2016
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 88 units

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Proposed amendments to the Etobicoke Zoning Code and By-law 569-2013 to permit the development of a total of 88 rental units within three, 3-storey buildings containing 30 multiple attached units plus a 6-storey mid-rise apartment building containing 58 units. An existing 12-storey apartment building will be maintained.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

H & R Developments · registration SM23132
To provide a description of the proposed development at 70 Dixfield Drive
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.74
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM23132: To provide a description of the proposed development at 70 Dixfield Drive (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 130337 WET 03 OZ at 70 Dixfield Dr: Proposed amendments to the Etobicoke Zoning Code and By-law 569-2013 to permit the development of a total of 88 rental units within three, 3-storey buildings containing 30 multiple attached units plus a 6-storey mid-rise apartment building containing 58 units. An existing 12-storey apartment buildi… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: To provide a description of the proposed development at 70 Dixfield Drive
Matched fields
address
70 DIXFIELD DR
application_address
70 DIXFIELD DR

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 1 communication · 1 meeting · 1 office contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Ward 3 Etobicoke Centre1

Data table· 1 row

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 3 Etobicoke Centre	Member of council	1	1	6 May 2016

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Goldberg Group1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 2

9 lobbied · 10 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=78
Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied14%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 2: 9 lobbied and 10 matched unlobbied applications in 8 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	9	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	10	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	571	—	100% (n=78)	0%	12%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	760	—	96% (n=78)	4%	14%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.