Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 16 128441 ESC 39 OZ

Ward 22 · Nick MantasDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 16 March 2016; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 1; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 2; 2 meetings · 2 offices

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 3268 Finch Ave E
Ward: Ward 22 · Nick Mantas
Submitted: 16 March 2016
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

The applicant is proposing a 12-storey mixed use building with rooftop indoor amenity and at-grade day care uses.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

2306986 Ontario Inc. · registration SM21955
Mixed use development proposal at 3268 Finch Ave. East.
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.76
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM21955: Mixed use development proposal at 3268 Finch Ave. East. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 128441 ESC 39 OZ at 3268 Finch Ave E: The applicant is proposing a 12-storey mixed use building with rooftop indoor amenity and at-grade day care uses. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Mixed use development proposal at 3268 Finch Ave. East.
Matched fields
address
3268 FINCH AVE E
application_address
3268 FINCH AVE E

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 2 communications · 2 meetings · 2 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Ward 39 Scarborough-Agincourt1
Ward 40 Scarborough-Agincourt1

Data table· 2 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 39 Scarborough-Agincourt	Member of council	1	1	22 June 2015
Ward 40 Scarborough-Agincourt	Member of council	1	1	22 June 2015

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

M. Behar Planning & Design Inc.1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 22

6 lobbied · 10 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 22: 6 lobbied and 10 matched unlobbied applications in 4 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	6	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	10	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.