Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 16 103438 ESC 39 SA
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 12 January 2016
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 2981 Kennedy Rd
- Ward
- Ward 22 · Nick Mantas
- Submitted
- 12 January 2016
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Proposal to construct a one storey warehouse with accessory office space, the two existing buildings on site will be demolished. November 7, advisedapplicant to submit amended plans with cover letter; awaiting agreement from legal, will then amend agreement as necessary. Will be meeting applicant with Eng staff on Jan 8/17 to finalize outstanding issues. Outstanding issues regarding stormwater management, site serviceing required. Awaiting revisions from applicant
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Hongtail Industry holding Ltd · registration SM23078
2981 kennedy road
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.77
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM23078: 2981 kennedy road (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 103438 ESC 39 SA at 2981 Kennedy Rd: Proposal to construct a one storey warehouse with accessory office space, the two existing buildings on site will be demolished. November 7, advisedapplicant to submit amended plans with cover letter; awaiting agreement from legal, will then amend agreement as necessary. Will be meeting applicant w… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 2981 kennedy road
Matched fields
- address
- 2981 KENNEDY RD
- application_address
- 2981 KENNEDY RD
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsNo communications recorded.
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 22
7 lobbied · 14 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 7 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 14 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.