Development application · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
Development application 15 270704 ESC 37 CD
1955 Victoria Park Ave; 1961 Victoria Park Ave; 1967 Victoria Park Ave; 1973 Victoria Park Ave; 1973-1991 Victoria Park Ave; 1979 Victoria Park Ave; 1985 Victoria Park Ave; 1991 Victoria Park Ave
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 31 December 2015
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
- Addresses
- 1955 Victoria Park Ave; 1961 Victoria Park Ave; 1967 Victoria Park Ave; 1973 Victoria Park Ave; 1973-1991 Victoria Park Ave; 1979 Victoria Park Ave; 1985 Victoria Park Ave; 1991 Victoria Park Ave
- Ward
- Ward 21 · Michael Thompson
- Submitted
- 31 December 2015
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 84 units
- Related file
- 15-270707
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
Magnus Opus Developments (Victoria Park) Corporation, owners of the properties, generally described as (municipal numbers): 1955, 1961, 1967, 1973, 1979, 1985 and 1991 Victoria Park Avenue have submitted a Rental Housing Demolition and Conversion application (File No 15 270707 ESC 37 RH) to convert the existing 84 rental townhouses to 84 condominium ownership townhouses. The owners have also made a concurrent application (File No. 15 270704 ESC 37 CD) for Standard Condominium Approval under the Condominium Act for the 84 townhouse units and lands. See File No. 15 270707 ESC 37 RH for circulation and processing of this condominium approval application (File No. 15 270704 ESC 37 CD)
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.