lobbyTO

Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 15 267780 NNY 25 OZ

2710 Bayview Ave; 2716 Bayview Ave; 2720 Bayview Ave; 2722 Bayview Ave

Status
Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted
21 December 2015
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
2
Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations
8
0 meetings · 2 offices

Application record

Type
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses
2710 Bayview Ave; 2716 Bayview Ave; 2720 Bayview Ave; 2722 Bayview Ave
Ward
Ward 15 · Rachel Chernos Lin
Submitted
21 December 2015
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description
20 units

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

The purpose of the rezoning and site plan applications is to permit 3 blocks of townhouses along Bayview Avenue with a total of 20 units. Additionally, one detached dwelling is proposed west of the townhouses on Caldy Court. Vehicular access would be provided from Fifeshire Road. The detached dwelling would be located behind the townhouses and take access from Caldy Court (also see Site Plan Application File No. 16 212893 NNY 25 SA).

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 8 communications · 0 meetings · 2 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations
  • Office of Councillor Jaye Robinson, Ward 157
  • Ward 25 Don Valley West1
Data table· 2 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Office of Councillor Jaye Robinson, Ward 15Councillor staff7022 June 2021
Ward 25 Don Valley WestMember of council1028 November 2017

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 15

20 lobbied · 36 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=2
  • Matched, unlobbied100% n=5

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied10%
  • Matched, unlobbied25%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied1,925
  • Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=64
  • Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied13%
  • Matched, unlobbied13%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 15: 20 lobbied and 36 matched unlobbied applications in 15 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied20—100% (n=2)0%10%0.05
Matched, unlobbied36—100% (n=5)0%25%0.01
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied5731,925100% (n=64)0%13%0.08
Matched, unlobbied7631,79398% (n=70)2%13%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.