Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 15 267085 STE 19 SA
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 18 December 2015
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 840 Dupont St; 860 Dupont St
- Ward
- Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
- Submitted
- 18 December 2015
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Related file
- 13 203675 STE 19 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Dec 2020 Resubmission: revisions include minor technical and design changes to address staff comments. Feb 2020 Revision: Proposal to permit a mixed use building with retail and residential uses. The total proposed residential gross floor area will be 29,357 sq m and non-residential gfa will be 3,136 sq m. The previously proposed grocery store has been eliminated resulting in less parking spaces and loading spaces. Original Proposal : to permit a mixed use development including office, retail, and residential uses. The total proposed residential gross floor area will be 27, 873.05 square metres and the non residential gross floor area proposed is 10, 862.22 square metres.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Sobeys Inc. · registration SM25218
840 - 860 Dupont Street, Toronto, ON
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.83
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM25218: 840 - 860 Dupont Street, Toronto, ON (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 267085 STE 19 SA at 840 Dupont St: Dec 2020 Resubmission: revisions include minor technical and design changes to address staff comments. Feb 2020 Revision: Proposal to permit a mixed use building with retail and residential uses. The total proposed residential gross floor area will be 29,357 sq m and non-residential gfa will be 3,1… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 840 - 860 Dupont Street, Toronto, ON
Matched fields
- address
- 840-860 DUPONT ST
- application_address
- 840 DUPONT ST
Sobey's Developments Limited Partnership · registration SM19765
Retained to assist with OPA and rezoning of 840-860 Dupont Street. Application has been made for mixed use, including residential retail and office/commercial
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.84
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM19765: Retained to assist with OPA and rezoning of 840-860 Dupont Street. Application has been made for mixed use, including residential retail and office/commercial (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 267085 STE 19 SA at 840 Dupont St: Dec 2020 Resubmission: revisions include minor technical and design changes to address staff comments. Feb 2020 Revision: Proposal to permit a mixed use building with retail and residential uses. The total proposed residential gross floor area will be 29,357 sq m and non-residential gfa will be 3,1… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Retained to assist with OPA and rezoning of 840-860 Dupont Street. Application has been made for mixed use, including residential retail and office/commercial
Matched fields
- address
- 840-860 DUPONT ST
- application_address
- 840 DUPONT ST
Lobbying on linked registrations
2 linked registrations · 4 communications · 4 meetings · 4 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 4 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parks Forestry and Recreation | City staff | 1 | 1 | 2 November 2017 |
| Councillor Ward 19 | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 30 October 2013 |
| Ward 19 | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 30 October 2013 |
| Ward 19 Trinity-Spadina | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 2 November 2017 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- 002020235 Ontario LimitedSM22158 · 25 August 2015 · “860 Dupont Street”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 11
46 lobbied · 113 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 46 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 9% | 0.09 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 113 | — | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.02 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.