Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 15 258711 ESC 37 SA

1900 Eglinton Ave E

Ward 21 · Michael ThompsonDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Under Review; In progress
Submitted: 30 November 2015; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses: 1900 Eglinton Ave E
Ward: Ward 21 · Michael Thompson
Submitted: 30 November 2015
Status: Under Review
Outcome recorded: In progress
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

INACTIVE Proposed site plan approval to permit an existing 640 sq.ft. (59.5 sm), "Penguin Pick-Up (PPU)" building located on the retail/commercial lands at 1900 Eglinton Avenue East. The PPU is designed as a convenience pick-up facility for customers to retrieve on-line purchases. PPU staff retrieve the parcel from the PPU building and bring the item to customers who can park in the PPU designated parking area. The PPU is self-sufficient without the need to connect to utility services, such as stormwater or sewage, to operate. Hydro connection is provided via an existing light standard.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

SmartCentres REIT
SM34159 · 8 February 2023 · “1900 Eglinton Avenue East”
SmartCentres REIT
SM34242 · 2 February 2023 · “1900 Eglinton Avenue East”
Calloway REIT (1900 Eglinton) Inc.
SM33020 · 4 March 2022 · “1900 Eglinton Avenue East”
Eglinton Shopping centres Limited
SM11339 · 6 March 2008 · “1900 Eglinton Avenue East.”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 21

10 lobbied · 44 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=63
Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 21: 10 lobbied and 44 matched unlobbied applications in 9 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	10	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	44	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=63)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,236	—	97% (n=98)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.