Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 15 231646 NNY 15 SA
7 Carhartt Street; 12 Marquette Ave; 14 Marquette Ave; 16 Marquette Ave; 18 Marquette Ave
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 1 October 2015
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 7 Carhartt Street; 12 Marquette Ave; 14 Marquette Ave; 16 Marquette Ave; 18 Marquette Ave
- Ward
- Ward 8 · Mike Colle
- Submitted
- 1 October 2015
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 48 units
- Related file
- 14 182666 NNY 15 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
4-storey apartment building with 48 residential units and 49 parking spaces in a 1-level below grade garage on a lot assembly consisting of 5 lots.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Marquette Urban Townshomes Incl · registration SM21462
12-18 Marquette Avenue, 7 Carhartt Street
Evidence High confidence · score 0.90
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM21462: 12-18 Marquette Avenue, 7 Carhartt Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 231646 NNY 15 SA at 12 Marquette Ave: 4-storey apartment building with 48 residential units and 49 parking spaces in a 1-level below grade garage on a lot assembly consisting of 5 lots. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 12-18 Marquette Avenue, 7 Carhartt Street
Matched fields
- address
- 12-18 MARQUETTE AVE
- application_address
- 12 MARQUETTE AVE
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 1 communication · 1 meeting · 1 office contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 15 Eglinton-Lawrence | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 24 February 2015 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 8
25 lobbied · 70 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 25 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 8% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 70 | 727 | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 4% | 0.00 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.