Development application · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
Development application 15 216054 WET 06 CD
28 Marina Ave; 62 Long Branch Ave; 68 A Long Branch Ave
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 10 September 2015
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
- Addresses
- 28 Marina Ave; 62 Long Branch Ave; 68 A Long Branch Ave
- Ward
- Ward 3 · Amber Morley
- Submitted
- 10 September 2015
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 28 units
- Related file
- 15 216041 WET 06 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
To establish a standard condominium containing 28 stacked townhouse units.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Mantella Corp · registration SM21988
62 & 68 Long Branch Avenue and 28 Marina Avenue
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.81
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM21988: 62 & 68 Long Branch Avenue and 28 Marina Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 216054 WET 06 CD at 62 Long Branch Ave: To establish a standard condominium containing 28 stacked townhouse units. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 62 & 68 Long Branch Avenue and 28 Marina Avenue
Matched fields
- address
- 62&68 LONG BRANCH AVE
- application_address
- 62 LONG BRANCH AVE
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 7 communications · 2 meetings · 2 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 2 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Office of Councillor Mark Grimes, Ward 6 | Councillor staff | 5 | 0 | 14 July 2017 |
| Ward 6 Etobicoke-Lakeshore | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 18 December 2015 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.