Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 15 216051 WET 06 SA

28 Marina Ave; 62 Long Branch Ave; 68 Long Branch Ave

Ward 3 · Amber MorleyDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 10 September 2015; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 1; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 7; 2 meetings · 2 offices

Application record

Type: Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses: 28 Marina Ave; 62 Long Branch Ave; 68 Long Branch Ave
Ward: Ward 3 · Amber Morley
Submitted: 10 September 2015
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 28 units
Related file: 15 216041 WET 06 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Proposing two blocks of three-storey stacked townhouses containing a total of 28 residential dwelling units consisting of one block of 8 stacked townhouse units fronting Marina Avenue and a second block of 20 stacked townhouse units fronting Long Branch Avenue. Vehicle access to the site would be provided from Long Branch Avenue and all parking would be provided in an underground garage.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Mantella Corp · registration SM21988
62 & 68 Long Branch Avenue and 28 Marina Avenue
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.90
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM21988: 62 & 68 Long Branch Avenue and 28 Marina Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 216051 WET 06 SA at 62 Long Branch Ave: Proposing two blocks of three-storey stacked townhouses containing a total of 28 residential dwelling units consisting of one block of 8 stacked townhouse units fronting Marina Avenue and a second block of 20 stacked townhouse units fronting Long Branch Avenue. Vehicle access to the site would be p… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 62 & 68 Long Branch Avenue and 28 Marina Avenue
Matched fields
address
62&68 LONG BRANCH AVE
application_address
62 LONG BRANCH AVE

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 7 communications · 2 meetings · 2 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Office of Councillor Mark Grimes, Ward 65
Ward 6 Etobicoke-Lakeshore2

Data table· 2 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Office of Councillor Mark Grimes, Ward 6	Councillor staff	5	0	14 July 2017
Ward 6 Etobicoke-Lakeshore	Member of council	2	2	18 December 2015

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Design Plan Services Inc.1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 3

24 lobbied · 100 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied1,629

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=5
Matched, unlobbied70% n=10

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied30%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=61
Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 3: 24 lobbied and 100 matched unlobbied applications in 18 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	24	—	100% (n=5)	0%	4%	0.25
Matched, unlobbied	100	1,629	70% (n=10)	30%	4%	0.14

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=61)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,237	727	97% (n=96)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.