Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 15 209675 STE 20 OZ
49 Camden St; 49-51 Camden Street; 51 Camden St
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 19 August 2015
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 49 Camden St; 49-51 Camden Street; 51 Camden St
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Submitted
- 19 August 2015
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 7,918 m² gross floor area
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Redevelopment of a 620 square metre (0.15 acre) property located on the southeast corner of Camden Street and Brant Street, municipally known as 49 and 51 Camden Street (the subject site), for a 13-storey hotel with a partially integrated mechanical penthouse. The new Ace Hotel would consist of 130 hotel suites, a lower level restaurant, a gymnasium, a ground floor hotel lobby and various hotel-related meeting rooms. A penthouse lounge and outdoor terrace would be located on the 13th floor. A total gross floor area of 7,918 square metres is proposed.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
51 Camden Street Holdings Ltd. · registration SM22197
Application file no. 15 209675 STE 20 OZ-- 49-51 Camden Street
Evidence High confidence · score 1.00
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM22197: Application file no. 15 209675 STE 20 OZ-- 49-51 Camden Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 209675 STE 20 OZ at 51 Camden St: Redevelopment of a 620 square metre (0.15 acre) property located on the southeast corner of Camden Street and Brant Street, municipally known as 49 and 51 Camden Street (the subject site), for a 13-storey hotel with a partially integrated mechanical penthouse. The new Ace Hotel would consist of 130… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Application file no. 15 209675 STE 20 OZ-- 49-51 Camden Street
- particulars: Application file no. 15 209675 STE 20 OZ-- 49-51 Camden Street
Matched fields
- file_number
- 15 209675 STE 20 OZ
- address
- 49-51 CAMDEN ST
- application_address
- 49-51 CAMDEN ST
Notes
The registration names this application's file number.
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 4 communications · 1 meeting · 3 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 3 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mayor's Office | Councillor staff | 2 | 0 | 17 February 2016 |
| Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 5 October 2015 |
| Ward 23 Willowdale | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 3 September 2015 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Zinc DevelopmentsSM22919 · 29 March 2016 · “49-51 Camden Street”
- The Alterra Group of CompaniesSM21483 · 27 February 2015 · “51 Camden St.”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10
88 lobbied · 94 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 88 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 11% | 0.03 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 94 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 5% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.