lobbyTO

Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 15 188805 STE 19 OZ

585 Bloor St W; 588 Markham St; 590 Markham St; 592 Markham St; 593 Bloor St W; 594 Markham St; 595 Bloor St W; 596 Markham St; 597 Bloor St W; 598 Markham St; 600 Markham St; 602 Markham St; 602A Markham St; 604 Markham St; 606 Markham St; 608 Markham St; 610 Markham St; 612 Markham St

Status
Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted
10 July 2015
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
2
Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations
22
20 meetings · 7 offices

Application record

Type
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses
585 Bloor St W; 588 Markham St; 590 Markham St; 592 Markham St; 593 Bloor St W; 594 Markham St; 595 Bloor St W; 596 Markham St; 597 Bloor St W; 598 Markham St; 600 Markham St; 602 Markham St; 602A Markham St; 604 Markham St; 606 Markham St; 608 Markham St; 610 Markham St; 612 Markham St
Ward
Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
Submitted
10 July 2015
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Related file
15 188751 STE 19 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

(WEST BLOCK)-The proposed development is located on at least two discrete east and west sites separated by Markham St, which together are proposed to accommodate 71 ,005 m2 of residential uses and 17,555 m2 of non-residential uses, resulting in a combined FSI of 6.25.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 22 communications · 20 meetings · 7 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations
  • Ward 19 Trinity-Spadina8
  • Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina7
  • Real Estate Services2
  • Office of Councillor Cressy2
  • Office of Chief Corporate Officer1
  • Office of the Chief Corporate Officer1
  • Office of Councillor Layton1
Data table· 7 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Ward 19 Trinity-SpadinaMember of council8713 July 2017
Ward 20 Trinity-SpadinaMember of council7727 April 2017
Real Estate ServicesCity staff2226 April 2017
Office of Councillor CressyCouncillor staff2226 April 2017
Office of Chief Corporate OfficerCity staff1126 April 2017
Office of the Chief Corporate OfficerCity staff1126 April 2017
Office of Councillor LaytonCouncillor staff1026 April 2017

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 11

69 lobbied · 60 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=9
  • Matched, unlobbied100% n=4

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied10%
  • Matched, unlobbied11%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied1,925
  • Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=64
  • Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied13%
  • Matched, unlobbied13%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 11: 69 lobbied and 60 matched unlobbied applications in 31 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied69—100% (n=9)0%10%0.04
Matched, unlobbied60—100% (n=4)0%11%0.03
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied5731,925100% (n=64)0%13%0.08
Matched, unlobbied7631,79398% (n=70)2%13%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.