Development application · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)

Development application 15 168736 STE 20 CD

10 Nelson St; 30 Nelson St; 36 Nelson St; 181 Richmond St W; 199 Richmond St W; 203 Richmond St. West.

Ward 10 · Ausma MalikDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 4 June 2015; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
Addresses: 10 Nelson St; 30 Nelson St; 36 Nelson St; 181 Richmond St W; 199 Richmond St W; 203 Richmond St. West.
Ward: Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
Submitted: 4 June 2015
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 333 units
Related file: 08 146250 STE 20 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

Application for draft plan of condominium for 333 residential units in a 31-storey building with 181 below-grade parking spaces. This standard condominium application is part of a larger mixed-use redevelopment plan that also includes a 41-storey building, which is not part of this application.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Aspen Ridge Homes
SM13864 · 14 December 2009 · “203 Richmond St. West.”
Aspen Ridge Homes
SM13707 · 6 November 2009 · “199 Richmond St. West.”
Aspen Ridge (Richmond) Limited
SM11903 · 25 June 2008 · “199 Richmond Street West”
Aspen Ridge (Richmond) Limited
SM11901 · 7 April 2008 · “199 Richmond Street West”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 10

4 lobbied · 25 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

28 lobbied · 95 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Data table· 4 rows

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 10: 4 lobbied and 25 matched unlobbied applications in 4 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	4	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	25	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide: 28 lobbied and 95 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	28	—	100% (n=3)	0%	0%	0.04
Matched, unlobbied	95	—	100% (n=6)	0%	0%	0.03

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.