Address
10 Nelson St
About this address
- Ward
- — (address points for this address fall in more than one ward)
- Location
- 43.64926, -79.38758
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
4- Submitted 25 January 2016Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 16 108387 STE 20 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 4 June 2015Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 15 168736 STE 20 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 4 April 2011Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 11 164260 STE 20 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 11 April 2008Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 08 146250 STE 20 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 4 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16 108387 STE 20 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 25 January 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 15 168736 STE 20 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 4 June 2015 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 11 164260 STE 20 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 4 April 2011 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 08 146250 STE 20 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 11 April 2008 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
199 Richmond St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
08 146250 STE 20 OZ · submitted 11 April 2008 · Closed · from registration SM11901 (Aspen Ridge (Richmond) Limited)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.78
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM11901: 199 Richmond Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 08 146250 STE 20 OZ at 199 Richmond St W: Zoning amendment application for re-developement of the site for a mixed use building containing 746 dwelling units (56280m2 of residential gfa) and 1332m2 of non residential gross floor area in a 41 and 31 storey tower connected by a two to eight storey podium. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 199 Richmond Street West
Matched fields
- address
- 199 RICHMOND ST W
- application_address
- 199 RICHMOND ST W
199 Richmond St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
08 146250 STE 20 OZ · submitted 11 April 2008 · Closed · from registration SM11903 (Aspen Ridge (Richmond) Limited)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM11903: 199 Richmond Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 08 146250 STE 20 OZ at 199 Richmond St W: Zoning amendment application for re-developement of the site for a mixed use building containing 746 dwelling units (56280m2 of residential gfa) and 1332m2 of non residential gross floor area in a 41 and 31 storey tower connected by a two to eight storey podium. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 199 Richmond Street West
Matched fields
- address
- 199 RICHMOND ST W
- application_address
- 199 RICHMOND ST W
199 Richmond St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
08 146250 STE 20 OZ · submitted 11 April 2008 · Closed · from registration SM13707 (Aspen Ridge Homes)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.76
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM13707: Application to rezone lands municipally known as 199 Richmond St. West. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 08 146250 STE 20 OZ at 199 Richmond St W: Zoning amendment application for re-developement of the site for a mixed use building containing 746 dwelling units (56280m2 of residential gfa) and 1332m2 of non residential gross floor area in a 41 and 31 storey tower connected by a two to eight storey podium. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Application to rezone lands municipally known as 199 Richmond St. West.
Matched fields
- address
- 199 RICHMOND ST W
- application_address
- 199 RICHMOND ST W
199 Richmond St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
08 146250 STE 20 OZ · submitted 11 April 2008 · Closed · from registration SM13864 (Aspen Ridge Homes)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.81
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM13864: Application to rezone lands municipally known as 199 and 203 Richmond St. West. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 08 146250 STE 20 OZ at 199 Richmond St W: Zoning amendment application for re-developement of the site for a mixed use building containing 746 dwelling units (56280m2 of residential gfa) and 1332m2 of non residential gross floor area in a 41 and 31 storey tower connected by a two to eight storey podium. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Application to rezone lands municipally known as 199 and 203 Richmond St. West.
Matched fields
- address
- 203 RICHMOND ST W
- application_address
- 203 RICHMOND ST W
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 10
4 lobbied · 25 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 25 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10
66 lobbied · 165 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 66 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 3% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 165 | — | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10
88 lobbied · 94 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 88 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 10% | 0.03 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 94 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 5% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.