Development application · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
Development application 15 142340 STE 19 CD
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 16 April 2015
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
- Addresses
- 1243 Dundas St W
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Submitted
- 16 April 2015
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 39 units
- Related file
- 11 112802 STE 19 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
Draft Plan of Condominium application for an 8-storey Standard Condominium comprised of 39 residential units, commercial at grade, and 1 level of below grade parking.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
1245 Dundas Inc · registration SM22368
to obtain City of Toronto approval of the Plan of Standard Condominium (known as Abacus) for 1243 Dundas St W
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.87
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22368: to obtain City of Toronto approval of the Plan of Standard Condominium (known as Abacus) for 1243 Dundas St W (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 142340 STE 19 CD at 1243 Dundas St W: Draft Plan of Condominium application for an 8-storey Standard Condominium comprised of 39 residential units, commercial at grade, and 1 level of below grade parking. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: to obtain City of Toronto approval of the Plan of Standard Condominium (known as Abacus) for 1243 Dundas St W
Matched fields
- address
- 1243 DUNDAS ST W
- application_address
- 1243 DUNDAS ST W
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsNo communications recorded.
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 10
4 lobbied · 25 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 25 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.