lobbyTO

Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 14 267151 STE 22 OZ

701 Soudan Ave; 703 Soudan Ave; 707 Soudan Ave; 709 Soudan Ave; 711 Soudan Ave; 713 Soudan Ave; 720 Hillsdale Ave E; 730 Hillsdale Ave E; 1674 Bayview Ave; 1678 Bayview Ave; 1680 Bayview Ave; 1682 Bayview Ave; 1684 Bayview Ave

Status
Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted
23 December 2014
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
1
Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations
9
5 meetings · 2 offices

Application record

Type
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses
701 Soudan Ave; 703 Soudan Ave; 707 Soudan Ave; 709 Soudan Ave; 711 Soudan Ave; 713 Soudan Ave; 720 Hillsdale Ave E; 730 Hillsdale Ave E; 1674 Bayview Ave; 1678 Bayview Ave; 1680 Bayview Ave; 1682 Bayview Ave; 1684 Bayview Ave
Ward
Ward 15 · Rachel Chernos Lin
Submitted
23 December 2014
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description
146 units

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Proposal for official plan amendment and rezoning related to a proposed 7 storey mixed use building with a commercial ground floor and residential above (a total of 146 units) with 3 levels of underground parking

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 9 communications · 5 meetings · 2 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations
  • Ward 22 St. Paul's6
  • Josh Matlow3
Data table· 2 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Ward 22 St. Paul'sMember of council6521 October 2016
Josh MatlowCouncillor staff306 June 2017

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 15

20 lobbied · 36 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=2
  • Matched, unlobbied100% n=5

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied10%
  • Matched, unlobbied25%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied1,925
  • Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=64
  • Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied13%
  • Matched, unlobbied13%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 15: 20 lobbied and 36 matched unlobbied applications in 15 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied20—100% (n=2)0%10%0.05
Matched, unlobbied36—100% (n=5)0%25%0.01
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied5731,925100% (n=64)0%13%0.08
Matched, unlobbied7631,79398% (n=70)2%13%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.