Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 14 266726 ESC 44 SA
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 22 December 2014
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 15 Heron Park Pl
- Ward
- Ward 25 · Neethan Shan
- Submitted
- 22 December 2014
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 10,254 m² gross floor area
- Related file
- 14 101641 ESC 44 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
Site Plan Control Application for proposed townhouses on the former Heron Park Public School site. This application pertains to Parcel A of the lands, and proposes 76 back to back townhouse units in four buildings, with a total GFA of 10,254 m2. A total of 88 parking spaces (76 resident and 12 visitor) are proposed. Parcel A comprises a total land area of 7,800 m2 of the entire 20,971 m2 site.Related Development Applications: Site Plan Control Application for Parcel B: 14 266731 ESC 44 SA;OPA and Zoning By-law Amendment Application: 14 101641 ESC 44 OZ ; Draft Plan of Subdivision Application: 14 101644 ESC 44 SB. The OPA and Zoning Amendment are now in effect, and the Draft Plan of Subdivison has been registered as 66M-2537,
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 25
4 lobbied · 18 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 18 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.