Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 14 188805 STE 22 SA
11 Lillian St; 15 Lillian St; 17 Lillian St; 132 Soudan Ave; 134 Soudan Ave; 136 Soudan Ave; 138 Soudan Ave; 140 Soudan Ave; 142 Soudan Ave
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 11 July 2014
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 11 Lillian St; 15 Lillian St; 17 Lillian St; 132 Soudan Ave; 134 Soudan Ave; 136 Soudan Ave; 138 Soudan Ave; 140 Soudan Ave; 142 Soudan Ave
- Ward
- Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
- Submitted
- 11 July 2014
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Related file
- 13 169170 STE 22 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
To obtain site plan approval for the construction of a 19-storey rsidential building containing 160 condo units.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
R.A.B Properites Ltd · registration SM18938
132-142 Soudan Avenue & 11 Lillian Street
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.80
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM18938: 132-142 Soudan Avenue & 11 Lillian Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 14 188805 STE 22 SA at 11 Lillian St: To obtain site plan approval for the construction of a 19-storey rsidential building containing 160 condo units. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 132-142 Soudan Avenue & 11 Lillian Street
Matched fields
- address
- 132-142 SOUDAN AVE
- application_address
- 132 SOUDAN AVE
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 9 communications · 4 meetings · 2 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 3 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 22 St. Paul's | Councillor staff | 4 | 0 | 5 November 2015 |
| Ward 22 St. Paul's | Member of council | 4 | 4 | 28 September 2015 |
| Ward 33 Don Valley East | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 10 December 2015 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Lash DevelopmentsSM21522 · 6 March 2015 · “11 Lillian Street”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 12
32 lobbied · 72 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 32 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 3% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 72 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.05 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.