Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 14 134958 STE 20 SA
324 Richmond St W; 326 Richmond St W; 328 Richmond St W; 332 Richmond St W
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 28 March 2014
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 324 Richmond St W; 326 Richmond St W; 328 Richmond St W; 332 Richmond St W
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Submitted
- 28 March 2014
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 311 units
- Related file
- 12 124056 STE 20 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
To obtain site plan approval for the construction of a 25 storey mixed use condo building containing 311 residential units plus 1 guest suite (12 bachelor, 238 one bedroom, 58 two bedroom, and 3 units with three or more bedrooms). Retail uses will be located on the ground floor. 150 parking spaces will be provided in five levels of below grade parking and 212 parking spaces will be provided in two levels of above-grade parking.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Petaluma Building Corp · registration SM23568
discussion about building height and parking for 324-332 Richmond St West.
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.76
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM23568: discussion about building height and parking for 324-332 Richmond St West. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 14 134958 STE 20 SA at 324 Richmond St W: To obtain site plan approval for the construction of a 25 storey mixed use condo building containing 311 residential units plus 1 guest suite (12 bachelor, 238 one bedroom, 58 two bedroom, and 3 units with three or more bedrooms). Retail uses will be located on the ground floor. 150 parking spaces … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: discussion about building height and parking for 324-332 Richmond St West.
Matched fields
- address
- 324-332 RICHMOND ST W
- application_address
- 324 RICHMOND ST W
Joe Di Giuseppe/Ted Wine · registration SM17312
324 to 332 Richmond Street West
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM17312: 324 to 332 Richmond Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 14 134958 STE 20 SA at 324 Richmond St W: To obtain site plan approval for the construction of a 25 storey mixed use condo building containing 311 residential units plus 1 guest suite (12 bachelor, 238 one bedroom, 58 two bedroom, and 3 units with three or more bedrooms). Retail uses will be located on the ground floor. 150 parking spaces … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 324 to 332 Richmond Street West
Matched fields
- address
- 332 RICHMOND ST W
- application_address
- 332 RICHMOND ST W
Lobbying on linked registrations
2 linked registrations · 7 communications · 5 meetings · 1 office contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 2 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina | Member of council | 6 | 5 | 28 October 2013 |
| Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 12 August 2014 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Joe Di Giuseppe/Ted WineSM17328 · 14 October 2011 · “332 Richmond Street West”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10
66 lobbied · 165 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 66 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 3% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 165 | 1,881 | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.