Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 13 281206 STE 27 OZ

1 Elm Ave; 2 Elm Ave; 3 Elm Ave; 4 Elm Ave; 6 Elm Ave; 10 Elm Ave; 20 Meredith Cres; 80 Mount Pleasant Rd; 120 Mount Pleasant Rd

Ward 11 · Dianne SaxeDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 24 December 2013; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 2; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 6; 6 meetings · 3 offices

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 1 Elm Ave; 2 Elm Ave; 3 Elm Ave; 4 Elm Ave; 6 Elm Ave; 10 Elm Ave; 20 Meredith Cres; 80 Mount Pleasant Rd; 120 Mount Pleasant Rd
Ward: Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
Submitted: 24 December 2013
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

To extend the zoning of the campus to abutting properties listed as 120 Mount Pleasant Road, 20 Meredith Cres.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Branksome Hall · registration SM20546
Branksome Hall (Application Nos. 13 281206 STE 27 SA and 13 281206 STE 27 OZ)
Evidence High confidence · score 1.00
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM20546: Branksome Hall (Application Nos. 13 281206 STE 27 SA and 13 281206 STE 27 OZ) (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 281206 STE 27 OZ at 2 Elm Ave: To extend the zoning of the campus to abutting properties listed as 120 Mount Pleasant Road, 20 Meredith Cres. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Branksome Hall (Application Nos. 13 281206 STE 27 SA and 13 281206 STE 27 OZ)
Matched fields
file_number
13 281206 STE 27 OZ
Notes
The registration names this application's file number.
Branksome Hall · registration SM20006
1-10 Elm Avenue, 120 Mt. Pleasant Road, 20 Meredith Crescent
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.75
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM20006: 1-10 Elm Avenue, 120 Mt. Pleasant Road, 20 Meredith Crescent (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 281206 STE 27 OZ at 2 Elm Ave: To extend the zoning of the campus to abutting properties listed as 120 Mount Pleasant Road, 20 Meredith Cres. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1-10 Elm Avenue, 120 Mt. Pleasant Road, 20 Meredith Crescent
Matched fields
address
1-10 ELM AVE
application_address
1 ELM AVE

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 6 communications · 6 meetings · 3 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale3
Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, Ward 272
City Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam1

Data table· 3 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale	Member of council	3	3	16 June 2014
Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, Ward 27	Councillor staff	2	2	16 June 2014
City Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam	Councillor staff	1	1	16 June 2014

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Maclennaan Jaunkalns Miller Architect1 registration
Dentons Canada LLP1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Branksome Hall
SM18539 · 15 October 2012 · “6 Elm Avenue”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 11

69 lobbied · 60 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=9
Matched, unlobbied100% n=4

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied10%
Matched, unlobbied11%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 11: 69 lobbied and 60 matched unlobbied applications in 31 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	69	—	100% (n=9)	0%	10%	0.04
Matched, unlobbied	60	—	100% (n=4)	0%	11%	0.03

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.