lobbyTO

Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 13 277902 WET 02 OZ

57 Rexdale Blvd; 2200 Islington Ave; 2260 Islington Ave

Status
Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted
13 December 2013
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
1
Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations
18
13 meetings · 12 offices

Application record

Type
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses
57 Rexdale Blvd; 2200 Islington Ave; 2260 Islington Ave
Ward
Ward 1 · Vincent Crisanti
Submitted
13 December 2013
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

The Development of 18 new low-rise commercial buildings and a gas bar supported by surface parking.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 18 communications · 13 meetings · 12 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations
  • Ward 2 Etobicoke North4
  • Vincent Crisanti4
  • Councillor Di Giorgio, Ward 121
  • Councillor Ford, Ward 21
  • Office of Councillor Crisanti, Ward 11
  • Ward 1 Etobicoke North1
  • Ward 11 York South-Weston1
  • Ward 12 York South-Weston1
Data table· 12 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Ward 2 Etobicoke NorthMember of council4317 July 2018
Vincent CrisantiMember of council4112 March 2024
Councillor Di Giorgio, Ward 12Councillor staff1119 April 2018
Councillor Ford, Ward 2Councillor staff1118 April 2018
Office of Councillor Crisanti, Ward 1Councillor staff119 April 2018
Ward 1 Etobicoke NorthMember of council119 April 2018
Ward 11 York South-WestonMember of council1118 April 2018
Ward 12 York South-WestonMember of council1119 April 2018
Ward 17 DavenportMember of council1118 April 2018
Ward 3 Etobicoke CentreMember of council1123 March 2018
Brad BradfordMember of council1111 December 2024
Olivia ChowMember of council1013 July 2023

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied1,925
  • Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=64
  • Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied13%
  • Matched, unlobbied13%
Data table· 2 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied5731,925100% (n=64)0%13%0.08
Matched, unlobbied7631,79398% (n=70)2%13%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.