Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 13 233677 WET 05 OZ
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 11 September 2013
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 30 Fieldway Rd
- Ward
- Ward 3 · Amber Morley
- Submitted
- 11 September 2013
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 148 units
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
Proposed amendments to the Etobicoke Zoning Code to permit the development of a six block, 4-storey stacked townhouse development containing 148 units. The development would have 152 space single level underground parking garage.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
North Star Homes Inc · registration SM18611
Proposed residential redevelopment 26-30 Fieldway Rd
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM18611: Proposed residential redevelopment 26-30 Fieldway Rd (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 233677 WET 05 OZ at 30 Fieldway Rd: Proposed amendments to the Etobicoke Zoning Code to permit the development of a six block, 4-storey stacked townhouse development containing 148 units. The development would have 152 space single level underground parking garage. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Proposed residential redevelopment 26-30 Fieldway Rd
Matched fields
- address
- 26-30 FIELDWAY RD
- application_address
- 30 FIELDWAY RD
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsNo communications recorded.
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Peppergreen Developments Inc.SM19169 · 2 April 2013 · “30 Fieldway Road”
- Martin DonnellySM17368 · 26 October 2011 · “30 Fieldway Road”
- 505806 Ontario Inc. (Limited) and 2090912 Ontario Inc. (Limited)SM17340 · 19 October 2011 · “30 Fieldway Road”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 3
37 lobbied · 72 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 37 | — | 100% (n=2) | 0% | 19% | 0.27 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 72 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 15% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.