Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 13 229698 NNY 09 SA
855 Wilson Avenue; 867 Wilson Ave
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 3 September 2013
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 855 Wilson Avenue; 867 Wilson Ave
- Ward
- Ward 6 · James Pasternak
- Submitted
- 3 September 2013
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 96 units
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
To construct 96 stacked townhouse dwelling units and 341m2 square metres of retail space and demolish existing commercial plaza.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Decade Group Inc · registration SM20867
855 Wilson Avenue
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.83
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM20867: 855 Wilson Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 229698 NNY 09 SA at 855 Wilson Ave: To construct 96 stacked townhouse dwelling units and 341m2 square metres of retail space and demolish existing commercial plaza. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 855 Wilson Avenue
Matched fields
- address
- 855 WILSON AVE
- application_address
- 855 WILSON AVE
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 3 communications · 2 meetings · 1 office contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 9 York Centre | Member of council | 3 | 2 | 15 September 2014 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Decade Group IncSM17669 · 1 January 2011 · “855 Wilson Avenue”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 6
17 lobbied · 41 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 17 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 41 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.