Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 13 190927 NNY 26 OZ
42 Overlea Blvd; 42-46 Overlea Blvd
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 19 June 2013
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 42 Overlea Blvd; 42-46 Overlea Blvd
- Ward
- Ward 15 · Rachel Chernos Lin
- Submitted
- 19 June 2013
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
Rezoning application to permit a one-storey, 14,752 square metre retail warehouse facility (Costco Warehouse Membership Club) on the western portion of the site and an ancillary 4 island, 8 pump gas bar and surface parking lot containing 566 parking spaces on the eastern portion of the site. A portion of the existing office building formerly occupied by Coca Cola Refreshments Canada would be retained and integrated into the proposed warehouse facility. The former bottling plant building on the site has been demolished. An application for Site Plan Approval has also been submitted.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
2041430 Ontario Limited · registration SM22370
Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 42-46 Overlea Boulevard. Permission is sought to Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 & East York By-law 1916 to permit a large scale stand alone retail store.
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.82
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22370: Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 42-46 Overlea Boulevard. Permission is sought to Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 & East York By-law 1916 to permit a large scale stand alone retail store. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 190927 NNY 26 OZ at 42 Overlea Blvd: Rezoning application to permit a one-storey, 14,752 square metre retail warehouse facility (Costco Warehouse Membership Club) on the western portion of the site and an ancillary 4 island, 8 pump gas bar and surface parking lot containing 566 parking spaces on the eastern portion of the site. A port… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 42-46 Overlea Boulevard. Permission is sought to Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 & East York By-law 1916 to permit a large scale stand alone reta…
Matched fields
- address
- 42-46 OVERLEA BLVD
- application_address
- 42-46 OVERLEA BLVD
Glen Day · registration SM21850
Official Plan Amendment 42-46 Overlea Blvd
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.74
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM21850: Official Plan Amendment 42-46 Overlea Blvd (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 190927 NNY 26 OZ at 42 Overlea Blvd: Rezoning application to permit a one-storey, 14,752 square metre retail warehouse facility (Costco Warehouse Membership Club) on the western portion of the site and an ancillary 4 island, 8 pump gas bar and surface parking lot containing 566 parking spaces on the eastern portion of the site. A port… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Official Plan Amendment 42-46 Overlea Blvd
Matched fields
- address
- 42-46 OVERLEA BLVD
- application_address
- 42-46 OVERLEA BLVD
Rice Commercial Group Limited · registration SM18750
Property Address is 42-46 Overlea Blvd, issue is zoning compliance for a redevelopment proposal.
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.71
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM18750: Property Address is 42-46 Overlea Blvd, issue is zoning compliance for a redevelopment proposal. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 190927 NNY 26 OZ at 42 Overlea Blvd: Rezoning application to permit a one-storey, 14,752 square metre retail warehouse facility (Costco Warehouse Membership Club) on the western portion of the site and an ancillary 4 island, 8 pump gas bar and surface parking lot containing 566 parking spaces on the eastern portion of the site. A port… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Property Address is 42-46 Overlea Blvd, issue is zoning compliance for a redevelopment proposal.
Matched fields
- address
- 42-46 OVERLEA BLVD
- application_address
- 42-46 OVERLEA BLVD
Lobbying on linked registrations
3 linked registrations · 40 communications · 17 meetings · 13 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 13 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 26 Don Valley West | Member of council | 21 | 11 | 14 July 2017 |
| Ward 16 Eglinton-Lawrence | Member of council | 3 | 1 | 3 November 2015 |
| Mayor's Office | Councillor staff | 2 | 1 | 3 November 2015 |
| Mayor | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 21 August 2013 |
| Ward 15 Eglinton-Lawrence | Member of council | 2 | 0 | 27 October 2015 |
| Ward 24 Willowdale | Member of council | 2 | 0 | 27 October 2015 |
| Ward 25 Don Valley West | Member of council | 2 | 0 | 3 November 2015 |
| Ward 2 Etobicoke North | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 24 January 2013 |
| Ward 29 Toronto-Danforth | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 3 November 2015 |
| Ward 34 Don Valley East | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 23 October 2015 |
| Ward 37 Scarborough Centre | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 23 October 2015 |
| Ward 40 Scarborough-Agincourt | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 3 November 2015 |
| Ward 9 York Centre | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 2 October 2013 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 15
20 lobbied · 36 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | — | 100% (n=2) | 0% | 10% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 36 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 25% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.