Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 13 153955 STE 32 SA
3 Buller Ave; 73 Woodbine Ave; 77 Woodbine Ave; 79 Woodbine Ave; 83 Woodbine Ave
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 19 April 2013
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 3 Buller Ave; 73 Woodbine Ave; 77 Woodbine Ave; 79 Woodbine Ave; 83 Woodbine Ave
- Ward
- Ward 19 · Brad Bradford
- Submitted
- 19 April 2013
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Related file
- 13 153946 STE 32 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Site plan application to permit 11 town houses in two buildings.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Rike Burkhardt · registration SM22660
Zoning and site plan application to permit a townhouse redevelopment at 73-83 Woodbine Avenue and 3 Buller Avenue
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.81
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22660: Zoning and site plan application to permit a townhouse redevelopment at 73-83 Woodbine Avenue and 3 Buller Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 153955 STE 32 SA at 73 Woodbine Ave: Site plan application to permit 11 town houses in two buildings. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Zoning and site plan application to permit a townhouse redevelopment at 73-83 Woodbine Avenue and 3 Buller Avenue
Matched fields
- address
- 73-83 WOODBINE AVE
- application_address
- 73 WOODBINE AVE
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsNo communications recorded.
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Greylane Holdings Inc.SM11224 · 11 February 2008 · “3 Buller Avenue”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 19
6 lobbied · 28 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 6 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 28 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.