Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 13 146991 STE 20 OZ
39 Glasgow St; 40 Glasgow St; 245-247 College St; 251 College St; 255 College St
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 9 April 2013
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 39 Glasgow St; 40 Glasgow St; 245-247 College St; 251 College St; 255 College St
- Ward
- Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
- Submitted
- 9 April 2013
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Related file
- 10 239490 STE 20 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
Official Plan Ammendment application to permit construction of new 25-storey mixed use building, with retail and academic services at grade and an academic residence above.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Knightstone Capital Management Inc. · registration SM15794
245-251 College Street and 39 and 40 Glasgow Street -- Rezoning Application
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.71
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM15794: 245-251 College Street and 39 and 40 Glasgow Street -- Rezoning Application (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 13 146991 STE 20 OZ at 255 College St: Official Plan Ammendment application to permit construction of new 25-storey mixed use building, with retail and academic services at grade and an academic residence above. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 245-251 College Street and 39 and 40 Glasgow Street -- Rezoning Application
Matched fields
- address
- 245-251 COLLEGE ST
- application_address
- 245-247 COLLEGE ST
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 3 communications · 3 meetings · 1 office contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina | Member of council | 3 | 3 | 3 January 2013 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 11
69 lobbied · 60 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 69 | — | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 11% | 0.03 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.