lobbyTO

Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 13 124500 NNY 23 OZ

57 Linelle St

Ward 18 · Lily ChengDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page
Status
OMB Approved
Approved
Submitted
25 February 2013
Appealed
Linked lobbying registrations
5
Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations
11
8 meetings · 2 offices

Application record

Type
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses
57 Linelle St
Ward
Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
Submitted
25 February 2013
Status
OMB Approved
Outcome recorded
Approved
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
Yes

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

An application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law No. 7625 to permit a 34, 3-storey townhouse subdivision that extends the existing Linelle Street cul-de-sac southward in order to connect to the private road system that includes 6 visitor curbside parking and 34 residential parking spaces.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Lobbying on linked registrations

5 linked registrations · 11 communications · 8 meetings · 2 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations
  • Ward 23 Willowdale8
  • Office of Councillor John Filion, Ward 233
Data table· 2 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Ward 23 WillowdaleMember of council868 April 2015
Office of Councillor John Filion, Ward 23Councillor staff3220 November 2014

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 18

38 lobbied · 63 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=7
  • Matched, unlobbied100% n=3

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied21%
  • Matched, unlobbied15%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied1,925
  • Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=64
  • Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied13%
  • Matched, unlobbied13%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 18: 38 lobbied and 63 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied38—100% (n=7)0%21%0.00
Matched, unlobbied63—100% (n=3)0%15%0.04
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied5731,925100% (n=64)0%13%0.08
Matched, unlobbied7631,79398% (n=70)2%13%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.