Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 12 289795 NNY 26 SA

Ward 15 · Rachel Chernos LinDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 6 December 2012; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 2; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 5; 4 meetings · 2 offices

Application record

Type: Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses: 160 Vanderhoof Ave
Ward: Ward 15 · Rachel Chernos Lin
Submitted: 6 December 2012
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

18 storey residential building containing ten, two storey townhouses and 316 apartment dwelling units above , ground floor recreational area and six levels of underground parking - Scenic III (ARH) Developments Ltd.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Aspen Ridge Homes · registration SM19623
RE the development at 160 Vanderhoof Ave.
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.78
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM19623: RE the development at 160 Vanderhoof Ave. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 289795 NNY 26 SA at 160 Vanderhoof Ave: 18 storey residential building containing ten, two storey townhouses and 316 apartment dwelling units above , ground floor recreational area and six levels of underground parking - Scenic III (ARH) Developments Ltd. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: RE the development at 160 Vanderhoof Ave.
Matched fields
address
160 VANDERHOOF AVE
application_address
160 VANDERHOOF AVE
Aspen Ridge Homes · registration SM19413
Minor variance and site plan applications for 160 Vanderhoof Avenue and consultation process
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.89
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM19413: Minor variance and site plan applications for 160 Vanderhoof Avenue and consultation process (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 289795 NNY 26 SA at 160 Vanderhoof Ave: 18 storey residential building containing ten, two storey townhouses and 316 apartment dwelling units above , ground floor recreational area and six levels of underground parking - Scenic III (ARH) Developments Ltd. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Minor variance and site plan applications for 160 Vanderhoof Avenue and consultation process
Matched fields
address
160 VANDERHOOF AVE
application_address
160 VANDERHOOF AVE

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 5 communications · 4 meetings · 2 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Ward 26 Don Valley West3
Office of Councillor Parker, Ward 262

Data table· 2 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 26 Don Valley West	Member of council	3	3	14 January 2015
Office of Councillor Parker, Ward 26	Councillor staff	2	1	16 June 2013

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

N Barry Lyon Consultants Limited1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 15

12 lobbied · 41 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=61
Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 15: 12 lobbied and 41 matched unlobbied applications in 10 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	12	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	41	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=61)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,237	727	97% (n=96)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.