Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 12 245092 WET 05 OZ

5 Mabelle Ave; 7 Mabelle Ave; 9 Mabelle Ave; 64 Cordova Ave; 70 Cordova Ave

Ward 3 · Amber MorleyDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 12 September 2012; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 1; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 12; 6 meetings · 3 offices

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 5 Mabelle Ave; 7 Mabelle Ave; 9 Mabelle Ave; 64 Cordova Ave; 70 Cordova Ave
Ward: Ward 3 · Amber Morley
Submitted: 12 September 2012
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

Proposal for three residential apartment buildings (35, 38 and 45 storeys) containing 1,218 unitson a 3 storey podium on former TTC commuter parking lot for Islington Subway Station. A total of 1,236 parking spaces, including visitor parking is proposed to be provided at grade as well as three below grade parking levels. The proposed density is 6.69 times the area of the lot.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Deltera Inc. · registration SM19666
Islington Terrace & Bloorvista at Islington Terrace. Development of property at 7 & 9 Mabelle Avenue, Etobicoke. Rezoning and Site plan matters
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.80
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM19666: Islington Terrace & Bloorvista at Islington Terrace. Development of property at 7 & 9 Mabelle Avenue, Etobicoke. Rezoning and Site plan matters (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 245092 WET 05 OZ at 64 Cordova Ave: Proposal for three residential apartment buildings (35, 38 and 45 storeys) containing 1,218 unitson a 3 storey podium on former TTC commuter parking lot for Islington Subway Station. A total of 1,236 parking spaces, including visitor parking is proposed to be provided at grade as well as three belo… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Islington Terrace & Bloorvista at Islington Terrace. Development of property at 7 & 9 Mabelle Avenue, Etobicoke. Rezoning and Site plan matters
Matched fields
address
7&9 MABELLE AVE
application_address
7 MABELLE AVE

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 12 communications · 6 meetings · 3 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Ward 5 Etobicoke-Lakeshore8
Mark Grimes2
Ward 2 Etobicoke Centre2

Data table· 3 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 5 Etobicoke-Lakeshore	Member of council	8	6	7 February 2017
Mark Grimes	Councillor staff	2	0	24 April 2020
Ward 2 Etobicoke Centre	Member of council	2	0	12 May 2020

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 3

37 lobbied · 72 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=4
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied16%
Matched, unlobbied15%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=78
Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied14%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 3: 37 lobbied and 72 matched unlobbied applications in 25 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	37	—	100% (n=4)	0%	16%	0.27
Matched, unlobbied	72	—	100% (n=6)	0%	15%	0.04

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	571	—	100% (n=78)	0%	12%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	760	—	96% (n=78)	4%	14%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.