lobbyTO

Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 12 235622 STE 27 OZ

4 Dundonald St; 7 Gloucester St; 9 Gloucester St; 11 Gloucester St; 587 Yonge St; 591 Yonge St; 593 Yonge St; 599 Yonge St

Status
Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted
24 August 2012
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
2
Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations
1
1 meeting · 1 office

Application record

Type
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses
4 Dundonald St; 7 Gloucester St; 9 Gloucester St; 11 Gloucester St; 587 Yonge St; 591 Yonge St; 593 Yonge St; 599 Yonge St
Ward
Ward 13 · Chris Moise
Submitted
24 August 2012
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description
514 units

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

Proposal to construct a 49 sty condo with 514 residential units, commercial at grade, maintain portion of Heritage building, and below grade parking. Application has been appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board as of April 5, 2013. RESUBMISSION - Proposal has been revised to a 44 storey tower at the south end of the site stepping back within the 75 degree angular plane and stepping down to an 18-storey tower at the north end of the site; The revised proposal has a total of 375 residential units and 192 parking spaces. RESUBMISSION March 14, 2013 - proposal has been revised so both tower elements are within the 75 degree angular plan, provide a minimum 6 metre sidewalk zone, a plaza at the north end of the site, 420 residential units and 192 parking spaces. RESUBMISSION - February 23 2015 of Site Servicing Report and Downstream Sanitary Combined and Storm Sewer Analysis. RESUBMISSION - October 8, 2015 to address comments from Engineering & Construction Services - Revised Functional Servicing and Combined Sewer Study and New Functional Stormwater Management Report

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 1 communication · 1 meeting · 1 office contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations
  • Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale1
Data table· 1 row
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Ward 27 Toronto Centre-RosedaleMember of council1130 April 2014

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13

83 lobbied · 97 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied—
  • Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=10
  • Matched, unlobbied93% n=14

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied7%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied11%
  • Matched, unlobbied17%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied1,925
  • Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=64
  • Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied13%
  • Matched, unlobbied13%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13: 83 lobbied and 97 matched unlobbied applications in 34 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied83—100% (n=10)0%11%0.14
Matched, unlobbied971,79393% (n=14)7%17%0.08
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied5731,925100% (n=64)0%13%0.08
Matched, unlobbied7631,79398% (n=70)2%13%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.