Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 12 197250 STE 22 SA
95 Broadway Ave; 99 Broadway Ave; 107 Broadway Ave; 197 Redpath Ave
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 20 June 2012
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 95 Broadway Ave; 99 Broadway Ave; 107 Broadway Ave; 197 Redpath Ave
- Ward
- Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
- Submitted
- 20 June 2012
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 912 units
- Related file
- 12 146382 STE 22 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
Site Plan approval application for construction of new residential building - 2 towers - 38 stories each connect by a 8 storey podium - 7 levels below grade parking - 366 parkingspaces - 912 residential units. - See 12 146382 STE 22oz for R e Zoning Application
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Sentinel (Broadway) Holdings Inc · registration SM18199
95 & 99 Broadway Avenue and 197 Redpath Avenue
Evidence High confidence · score 0.91
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM18199: 95 & 99 Broadway Avenue and 197 Redpath Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 197250 STE 22 SA at 99 Broadway Ave: Site Plan approval application for construction of new residential building - 2 towers - 38 stories each connect by a 8 storey podium - 7 levels below grade parking - 366 parkingspaces - 912 residential units. - See 12 146382 STE 22oz for R e Zoning Application (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 95 & 99 Broadway Avenue and 197 Redpath Avenue
Matched fields
- address
- 95&99 BROADWAY AVE
- application_address
- 95 BROADWAY AVE
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 2 communications · 1 meeting · 1 office contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 22 St. Paul's | Member of council | 2 | 1 | 9 August 2012 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 12
32 lobbied · 72 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 32 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 3% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 72 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.05 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.