Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 12 176179 NNY 16 OZ

Ward 8 · Mike ColleDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 18 May 2012; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 1; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 0; 0 meetings · 0 offices

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 190 Ridley Blvd; 200 Ridley Blvd
Ward: Ward 8 · Mike Colle
Submitted: 18 May 2012
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 30 units

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

The site contains an existing 91 unit 4-storey apartment building. The applicant proposes to redevelop the vacant front portion of the site, which includes the front lawn, circular driveway and surface parking lot, with a 3-storey (plus rooftop amenity area) apartment building consisting of 30 residential dwelling units. A total of 40 parking spaces are proposed in an underground garage with 34 spaces dedicated for residents and 6 for visitors. Parking for the existing building would be reconfigured with a total of 78 spaces consisting of 69 spaces for residents and 9 for visitors. A new driveway located at the southwest portion of the site replaces the existing circular driveway and will provide access to the existing apartment building and proposed apartment building.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Starlight Investments and Kanco 200 Ridley Ltd. · registration SM20797
Zoning and site plan applications to develop 200 Ridley Boulevard
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.75
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM20797: Zoning and site plan applications to develop 200 Ridley Boulevard (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 176179 NNY 16 OZ at 190 Ridley Blvd: The site contains an existing 91 unit 4-storey apartment building. The applicant proposes to redevelop the vacant front portion of the site, which includes the front lawn, circular driveway and surface parking lot, with a 3-storey (plus rooftop amenity area) apartment building consisting of 30 resi… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Zoning and site plan applications to develop 200 Ridley Boulevard
Matched fields
address
200 RIDLEY BLVD
application_address
200 RIDLEY BLVD

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

No communications recorded.

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Amber Stewart Law1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Davies Howe LLP
SM31446 · 1 April 2021 · “190 Ridley Blvd.”
Starlight Investments
SM17902 · 15 March 2012 · “200 Ridley Blvd.”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 8

33 lobbied · 57 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=2
Matched, unlobbied100% n=3

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 8: 33 lobbied and 57 matched unlobbied applications in 22 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	33	—	100% (n=2)	0%	12%	0.00
Matched, unlobbied	57	—	100% (n=3)	0%	27%	0.03

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.