Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 12 168197 NNY 16 OZ

31 Helendale Avenue; 33 Helendale Ave; 35 Helendale Ave; 37 Helendale Ave; 2360 Yonge St

Ward 8 · Mike ColleDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 7 May 2012; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 2; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 7; 0 meetings · 2 offices

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 31 Helendale Avenue; 33 Helendale Ave; 35 Helendale Ave; 37 Helendale Ave; 2360 Yonge St
Ward: Ward 8 · Mike Colle
Submitted: 7 May 2012
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 234 units; 2,695 m² gross floor area

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Rezoning application to permit a 28-storey mixed use residential and commercial building with 234 dwelling units and 2,695 m2 of commercial gross floor area. The proposed building consists of a six-storey base building (23.6 metres) with a 22-storey tower element. 147 parking spaces are proposed in five levels of below grade parking.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

KCAP Helendale Inc. · registration SM19474
2360 Yonge Street -- Rezoning Application
Evidence High confidence · score 0.94
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM19474: 2360 Yonge Street -- Rezoning Application (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 168197 NNY 16 OZ at 2360 Yonge St: Rezoning application to permit a 28-storey mixed use residential and commercial building with 234 dwelling units and 2,695 m2 of commercial gross floor area. The proposed building consists of a six-storey base building (23.6 metres) with a 22-storey tower element. 147 parking spaces are proposed in… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 2360 Yonge Street -- Rezoning Application
Matched fields
address
2360 YONGE ST
application_address
2360 YONGE ST
Pemberton Group Inc. · registration SM17286
31-37 Helendale Avenue
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.83
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM17286: 31-37 Helendale Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 168197 NNY 16 OZ at 2360 Yonge St: Rezoning application to permit a 28-storey mixed use residential and commercial building with 234 dwelling units and 2,695 m2 of commercial gross floor area. The proposed building consists of a six-storey base building (23.6 metres) with a 22-storey tower element. 147 parking spaces are proposed in… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 31-37 Helendale Avenue
Matched fields
address
31-37 HELENDALE AVE
application_address
31 HELENDALE AVE

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 7 communications · 0 meetings · 2 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Office of Councillor Carmichael Greb, Ward 165
Ward 16 Eglinton-Lawrence2

Data table· 2 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Office of Councillor Carmichael Greb, Ward 16	Councillor staff	5	0	7 April 2017
Ward 16 Eglinton-Lawrence	Member of council	2	0	25 May 2016

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Goodmans LLP1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Pemberton Group Inc.
SM19446 · 28 June 2013 · “31 Helendale Avenue”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 8

33 lobbied · 57 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=3

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied26%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=78
Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied14%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 8: 33 lobbied and 57 matched unlobbied applications in 22 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	33	—	100% (n=3)	0%	12%	0.00
Matched, unlobbied	57	—	100% (n=3)	0%	26%	0.03

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	571	—	100% (n=78)	0%	12%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	760	—	96% (n=78)	4%	14%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.