lobbyTO

Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 12 141911 STE 28 OZ

15 Lower Sherbourne St; 21 Sherbourne St; 60 Princess St; 70 Princess St; 121 Lower Sherbourne St; 177 Front St E; 181 Front St E; 183 Front St E; 197 Front St E; 200 The Esplanade

Status
Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted
23 March 2012
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
1
Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations
0
0 meetings · 0 offices

Application record

Type
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses
15 Lower Sherbourne St; 21 Sherbourne St; 60 Princess St; 70 Princess St; 121 Lower Sherbourne St; 177 Front St E; 181 Front St E; 183 Front St E; 197 Front St E; 200 The Esplanade
Ward
Ward 13 · Chris Moise
Submitted
23 March 2012
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description
1,679 units; 106,265 m² gross floor area

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

REVISED APPLICATION July 2015 - Rezoning application to permit the re-development of the block bounded by Lower Sherbourne Street, Princess Avenue, The Esplanade and Front Street East. The revised proposal is to permit four towers with heights of 33 storeys (100m), 29 storeys (98m), 27 storeys (94 m), and 25 storeys (88 m), on a 10-storey base podium building with residential and commercial uses. Proposed FSI is 9.35 and total GFA is 106,265 sq.m., with 1,679 residential units, 835 vehicle parking spaces. 4,548 sq m of public accessible privately owned space is proposed which comprises 40% of the site.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

No communications recorded.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13

82 lobbied · 96 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=13
  • Matched, unlobbied90% n=14

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied10%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied11%
  • Matched, unlobbied16%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=78
  • Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied12%
  • Matched, unlobbied14%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13: 82 lobbied and 96 matched unlobbied applications in 34 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied82—100% (n=13)0%11%0.15
Matched, unlobbied96—90% (n=14)10%16%0.08
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied571—100% (n=78)0%12%0.08
Matched, unlobbied760—96% (n=78)4%14%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.