Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 12 111249 WET 04 OZ

259 The Kingsway; 270 The Kingsway; 1144 Royal York Rd

Ward 2 · Stephen HolydayDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 24 January 2012; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 2; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 22; 14 meetings · 16 offices

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 259 The Kingsway; 270 The Kingsway; 1144 Royal York Rd
Ward: Ward 2 · Stephen Holyday
Submitted: 24 January 2012
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

Proposal for a mixed use development (Humbertown) at 259, 270 The Kingsway and 1144 Royal York Road.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

First capital Realty · registration SM18345
Rezoning Humbertown Shopping Centre - 259 and 270 The Kingsway and 1144 Royal York Road
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.78
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM18345: Rezoning Humbertown Shopping Centre - 259 and 270 The Kingsway and 1144 Royal York Road (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 111249 WET 04 OZ at 270 The Kingsway: Proposal for a mixed use development (Humbertown) at 259, 270 The Kingsway and 1144 Royal York Road. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Rezoning Humbertown Shopping Centre - 259 and 270 The Kingsway and 1144 Royal York Road
Matched fields
address
1144 ROYAL YORK RD
application_address
1144 ROYAL YORK RD
First Capital Asset Management · registration SM18181
Assist with the rezoning application for Humbertown Shopping Centre- 259 and 270 The Kingsway, and 1144 Royal York Road
Evidence High confidence · score 0.94
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM18181: Assist with the rezoning application for Humbertown Shopping Centre- 259 and 270 The Kingsway, and 1144 Royal York Road (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 111249 WET 04 OZ at 270 The Kingsway: Proposal for a mixed use development (Humbertown) at 259, 270 The Kingsway and 1144 Royal York Road. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Assist with the rezoning application for Humbertown Shopping Centre- 259 and 270 The Kingsway, and 1144 Royal York Road
Matched fields
address
1144 ROYAL YORK RD
application_address
1144 ROYAL YORK RD

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 22 communications · 14 meetings · 16 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina3
Ward 10 York Centre2
Ward 26 Don Valley West2
Ward 4 Etobicoke Centre2
Ward 5 Etobicoke-Lakeshore2
Mayor1
Ward 15 Eglinton-Lawrence1
Ward 16 Eglinton-Lawrence1

Data table· 16 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina	Member of council	3	2	7 June 2013
Ward 10 York Centre	Member of council	2	2	7 June 2013
Ward 26 Don Valley West	Member of council	2	2	6 June 2013
Ward 4 Etobicoke Centre	Member of council	2	2	23 April 2013
Ward 5 Etobicoke-Lakeshore	Member of council	2	2	3 May 2013
Mayor	Member of council	1	1	13 August 2012
Ward 15 Eglinton-Lawrence	Member of council	1	0	5 June 2013
Ward 16 Eglinton-Lawrence	Member of council	1	0	5 June 2013
Ward 18 Davenport	Member of council	1	1	4 June 2013
Ward 19 Trinity-Spadina	Member of council	1	0	5 June 2013
Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale	Member of council	1	1	6 June 2013
Ward 32 Beaches-East York	Member of council	1	0	5 June 2013
Ward 33 Don Valley East	Member of council	1	0	5 June 2013
Ward 34 Don Valley East	Member of council	1	1	6 June 2013
Ward 35 Scarborough Southwest	Member of council	1	0	5 June 2013
Ward 37 Scarborough Centre	Member of council	1	0	5 June 2013

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Slobodsky Associates1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 2

9 lobbied · 10 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 2: 9 lobbied and 10 matched unlobbied applications in 8 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	9	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	10	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.