Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 12 108570 STE 20 OZ

1 Cameron St; 3 Cameron St; 5 Cameron St; 7 Cameron St; 170 Spadina Ave

Ward 10 · Ausma MalikDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 19 January 2012; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 2; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 2; 2 meetings · 1 office

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 1 Cameron St; 3 Cameron St; 5 Cameron St; 7 Cameron St; 170 Spadina Ave
Ward: Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
Submitted: 19 January 2012
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 144 units

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Rezoning application to permit the redevelopment of the existing two storey non residential building with a new 12storey (40 metre) mixed-use building with 417m2 of retail area at the ground floor and 144 residential units,

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Monarch Corporation · registration SM20303
Pre-consultation regarding revisions to an existing Application to Amend the Zoning By-Law as it applies to 170 Spadina Ave to allow a primarily-residential condominum.
Evidence High confidence · score 0.92
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM20303: Pre-consultation regarding revisions to an existing Application to Amend the Zoning By-Law as it applies to 170 Spadina Ave to allow a primarily-residential condominum. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 108570 STE 20 OZ at 170 Spadina Ave: Rezoning application to permit the redevelopment of the existing two storey non residential building with a new 12storey (40 metre) mixed-use building with 417m2 of retail area at the ground floor and 144 residential units, (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Pre-consultation regarding revisions to an existing Application to Amend the Zoning By-Law as it applies to 170 Spadina Ave to allow a primarily-residential condominum.
Matched fields
address
170 SPADINA AVE
application_address
170 SPADINA AVE
Tri Win International Inc. · registration SM18135
Rezoning Application re 170 Spadina Avenue
Evidence High confidence · score 0.90
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM18135: Rezoning Application re 170 Spadina Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 108570 STE 20 OZ at 170 Spadina Ave: Rezoning application to permit the redevelopment of the existing two storey non residential building with a new 12storey (40 metre) mixed-use building with 417m2 of retail area at the ground floor and 144 residential units, (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Rezoning Application re 170 Spadina Avenue
Matched fields
address
170 SPADINA AVE
application_address
170 SPADINA AVE

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 2 communications · 2 meetings · 1 office contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina2

Data table· 1 row

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina	Member of council	2	2	15 April 2014

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Bousfields Inc.1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Plazacorp Investments Limited
SM29184 · 21 November 2019 · “170 Spadina Ave.”
Plazacorp Investments Limited
SM21676 · 16 April 2015 · “170 Spadina Avenue”
Plazacorp Investments Limited
SM21608 · 31 March 2015 · “170 Spadina Avenue”
Tri-Win International Investment Group Inc.
SM16264 · 28 April 2011 · “170 Spadina Avenue”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10

88 lobbied · 94 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=7
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied11%
Matched, unlobbied5%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10: 88 lobbied and 94 matched unlobbied applications in 38 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	88	—	100% (n=7)	0%	11%	0.03
Matched, unlobbied	94	—	100% (n=6)	0%	5%	0.01

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.