Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 11 332270 STE 30 OZ

98E Curzon St; 98N Curzon St; 98P Curzon St; 98Q Curzon St; 98R Curzon St; 100 A Curzon St; 100 B Curzon St; 100 C Curzon St; 100 Curzon St; 100 D Curzon St; 102 Curzon St; 104 Curzon St; 106 Curzon St

Ward 14 · Paula FletcherDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 30 December 2011; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 1; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 5; 2 meetings · 3 offices

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 98E Curzon St; 98N Curzon St; 98P Curzon St; 98Q Curzon St; 98R Curzon St; 100 A Curzon St; 100 B Curzon St; 100 C Curzon St; 100 Curzon St; 100 D Curzon St; 102 Curzon St; 104 Curzon St; 106 Curzon St
Ward: Ward 14 · Paula Fletcher
Submitted: 30 December 2011
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

Rezoning application to permit the re-development of a rear portion of the lands municpally knowns 102-106 Curzon Street for a new 3 storey infill townhouse building fronting onto the existing established right of way located on the lands municpally known as 98E Curzon Street providing access to Curzon Street.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

2302613 Ontario Inc · registration SM19432
102-106 and 98E Curzon St. Zoning and Consent To Applications Fire Route Agreement
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.88
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM19432: 102-106 and 98E Curzon St. Zoning and Consent To Applications Fire Route Agreement (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 332270 STE 30 OZ at 102 Curzon St: Rezoning application to permit the re-development of a rear portion of the lands municpally knowns 102-106 Curzon Street for a new 3 storey infill townhouse building fronting onto the existing established right of way located on the lands municpally known as 98E Curzon Street providing access to Cu… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 102-106 and 98E Curzon St. Zoning and Consent To Applications Fire Route Agreement
Matched fields
address
98E CURZON ST
application_address
98E CURZON ST

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 5 communications · 2 meetings · 3 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Councillor Fletcher3
Councillor Fletchers Office1
Ward 30 Toronto-Danforth1

Data table· 3 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Councillor Fletcher	Councillor staff	3	1	25 April 2014
Councillor Fletchers Office	Councillor staff	1	0	9 January 2014
Ward 30 Toronto-Danforth	Member of council	1	1	3 November 2011

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 14

18 lobbied · 28 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 14: 18 lobbied and 28 matched unlobbied applications in 14 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	18	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	28	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.